Originally posted by Stavri The Da* 200 f2.8 has always been at the top of my "wanted but don't need it" list, I'm having too much fun with the F 300 f4.5 (similar size, faster AF) to justify the purchase on such an otherwise gem of a lens optically. perhaps it's this is the right time to indulge myself and get one.
I have both the DA* 200 and the F* 300 4.5. I love both and both serve a different purpose. Also, my next FL below my 300 is 135 so the 200 fit in nicely. Sometimes the 300 is just too long, I like to use the 200 for walks in the woods when camping with the family, I have some telephoto range and can easily get far enough away to get photos of the family too. I did pick up the 200 for a really good price so it wasn't much of a gamble, plus the f/2.8 does come in handy at times. I recently purchased the DA* 300 for a good price too (maybe the prices are dropping on them as well? People selling to get the 150-450?) to test against my F* 300. I had to after the rave reviews of the 300 (and a decent price), so I will let my experience with both decide which one I put up for sale. The F* 300 is going to be tough to beat, especially for the compactness of it and the attached lens hood that extends out. The 300 looks large in photos, but so did the 200, which I was surprised to see how compact it is (heavy/solid, but compact) compared to looking at photos of it.