View Single Post
Old 10-13-2007, 08:49 AM   #17
WMBP
Site Supporter
 
WMBP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Gallery Photos: 11
Posts: 1,433
Originally Posted by philmorley View Post
also as far as noise goes, a bit little simplistic but

in film it was expose for the shadows, to make sure you got texture in shadows and highlights were not clipped, so dslrs at least originally (nikon d70 / d50 especially come to mind) underexposed a fraction or where at least of this tendency. However digital noise hides in the dark, so it is better to overexpose a fraction with digital and then pull it back to 'correct' exposure. So while your wading through the wealth of info on luminous landscape be sure to check the 'expose right' section.

Expose Right

of course you have to have enough knowledge to understand it properly and then implement (that 's not a criticism, I read it and about 6+ months later, went ahhh! I think I am beginning to understand what he was on about
Just want to sec Phil's reference to the excellent Expose Right article. The article is, I think, frequently misunderstood. It doens't say that it's better to blow out the highlights than the shadows, which many people seem to think. But I won't try to summarize it. Just want to second that link.

Will
__________________
William Porter ~ Dallas, Texas
http://william-porter.net (wedding/event photos)
http://picasaweb.google.com/wmb.porter (personal stuff)
+
WMBP is offline   Reply With Quote