Again?
Why must we continue to go down this dark alley without so much as a candle? The RAW vs JPEG debate has long ago been shown moot.
I can find a dozen reasons in both photos to prefer either over the other. But what does it matter? Generally the PC monitor is a crap viewing medium and I doubt you'd consider mailing everyone a nice 'B' sized full bleed of both images for evaluation; or would you?!?!
I'm glad for you in your discovery of RAW utility; be happy!
Originally Posted by Darius4522
I recall reading in here that converting K10D RAW images to jpgs resulted in a better image than straight jpgs. But not having ...