Originally posted by daacon Thanks bdery I may edit that indeed.
Thanks Norm - I believe all politicians are very similar (i.e. various degrees of corruption). It's get harder and harder with each passing year to cover anything up, the social media Big Brother is everywhere. . The popular vote here was split between the Wild Rose and the Progressive Conservative receiving the majority. The split allowed a majority NDP government without a majority of the popular vote. I agree the revenues from the $100+ a barrel days could have been handled better. I also agree it's much easier to govern in good economic times which Alberta has had a plethora of. I don't think initially the NDP will rock the boat too much , although there are some election promises that have people concerned (minimum wage increase to $15.00 for one). There is a lack of experience in the party and I am sure they are nervous and will tread lightly initially. Hell some of their MP elected are under 25 and still in school
---------- Post added 05-29-2015 at 09:24 AM ----------
it akin to Military Intelligence ......(absolute no offensive to those that bravely serve). it's some one here that hope to work for 4 years and receive a life time pension.
It's amazing for those of us who were alive in the 60's, who had friends who were communists, who actually took orders from the Kremlin, to the long since gone nationalist/left wing wing of the New Dems.. we actually experienced political philosophy's. These days, the PCs are a little to the right of the New Dems, and no one even know what a Liberal is, except "the party of the bland", som kind of "sfae" vote if you can't figure out the other two. So while officially Alberta has elected New Dems, they are so much like the other parties now, I'm not sure why anyone would think it's a big deal. The New Dems of the 60's make the modern New Dems look like PCs. The thing the right refuses to acknowledge, there are no more left wing parties in North America. What used to be the left has all moved into the centre.