Originally posted by turboast4 Alamo5000, I am curious to hear more about your experience. If you're willing to share, you can always PM me if you prefer not to write a long post in this thread.
I don't mind writing here. It's all good information for discussion. It will though be a long post
My experience is that I bought my first ever camera (DSLR) about 4 years ago (maybe a little less). Before that the best I ever did was point and shoot taking zero thought for composition or anything like that.
Fortunately I have had a couple of mentors so to speak that from time to time will look at my stuff. In the mean time I read a whole lot of books about photography and a few that were not specifically about photography.
Keep in mind that I am spouting off my opinion here...others may have a different perspective. The term 'fine art' photography is pretty broad. It's too broad in fact. All that word means to me is photography that can be considered (or traded or sold) to be something of value in the art world. It's not just 'oooh pretty picture' type stuff. It needs to have a lot more involved in it.
One friend of mine is a very well regarded painter. In fact he has a display at the Met in NYC. Yeah, he's no slouch. One painting generally will go for $30-50K...his advice to me and the advice I am passing on to you is read and learn about classical art. About paintings. That alone will get you in the right ballpark. Perception, depth, composition, shadow, lighting, all that has a massive cross over effect. It applies to both painting and photography. The other aspect is to do things that incorporate all those things in... but ALSO is relevant to your day, time, place or whatever. It has to have some kind of significant meaning. The more meaning it has to more people the better off you are.
Then again you have people who do abstract stuff all the time that personally I just don't get.
Generally though at very minimum you need to have a compelling subject that tells a story in an image format. The sky is the limit so be creative.
I have another photographer friend who is straight up into fine art... that's his living. One of his works was photographing tribal chiefs in Africa... and it's some of his best work. If I am not mistaken a major university bought his collection for a permanent display for their Africa studies program.
Yet another friend of mine... I went to Africa recently and I whipped out my 31mm and got what I thought was an awesome shot... really good exposure... good composition... it was of an African soldier carrying an AK47...the picture looked pretty good to me...so I sent it to him for a critique.
The response was a one liner. "Who is it and what is he doing?"
I responded, "I don't know, I just got the shot"
He responded back with one word, "Boring" as if to say, 'come back to me when you have something meaningful'.
The truth of the matter is they were standing guard outside of an embassy and were bored senseless so when the white guy walked by they wanted to talk or BS or whatever... to break up the monotony of an otherwise very hot and boring day. While technically the picture was good, the story wasn't interesting at all.
The offending image:
So long story short if you are getting into fine art there needs to be a whole lot more involved. It all just depends on what you like, your target market, and what it is you want to do. Some wishy washy answer won't cut it.
I have another friend (I think this is the 4th one mentioned here so far) who does all kinds of tropical photography. His market is pretty clear cut... he's targeting the people in beach culture.
I interviewed him for the forum once (see the link below)
Sean Davey Exclusive Interview - Photography | PentaxForums.com
At the end of the day you need to sharpen the stick more. It's easier said than done. But is someone going to hang your photo on the wall? If so who is going to hang it up? Next question is why are they going to hang it up? I mean is it some kind of motivational meme type picture of a pretty mountain with a catchy caption or is it more than that?