|
The rating... is it just one single number?
That gives me some problems rating lenses: Thinking of a any lens it might be excellent optically, be of bad built, give a lot of bang for the money but be cumbersome to use. What about a lens with great charactersistics for portraits but being flary and bad at long distances?
Maybe one can cover that with the comments but at the same time it makes the rating figure less valuable. I have seen these ratings at other places like photodo and it really isn't that useful. Clicking radio buttons for opinions is conveniant but I think anoter system with several options would be better - especially thinking of all the effort being put into this.
What about popular third party lenses? The Zenitar, Jupiter-9, Tokina 80-400, Sigma 18-125, Sigma 30/1.4 some Tamron short zoom and others?
Just comments, I guess you allready have thought about all this.
It's a great idea to have a lot of small lens reviews at one place!
regards,
__________________
Jonas
|