Originally posted by Bob from Aus FF lenses as follows:
300mm 2.8
200mm macro
70mm 1.4
50mm 1.2
35mm 1.8
28mm 2.8
24mm 2.0
24mm 3.5 shift lens
17mm fisheye
24 -100 2.8 zoom
Why not throw this one in
250-600 zoom
Wow! I like your optimism, but do you really think they have the design and/or production capacity to produce all that in time for FF release?
Maybe eventually, but I doubt the initial lineup will be that comprehensive.
I personally think the FA Ltds as well as the existing DA* primes (which are all FF compatible, apparently) will be their initial prime lineup, perhaps with an additional wide (24 mm).
---------- Post added 09-20-14 at 07:44 AM ----------
Originally posted by rawr I think a new zoom to sit below the 70-200 makes a lot of sense.
'Red ringing' the FA Ltd's is logical and should be easy to implement.
As would 'red-ringing' some FA designs: eg the FA 50 1.4, the FA 35 f2, FA 28 2.8 and the FA 20 2.8.
Yeah, I think it would be a little silly to release without a standard zoom: ~24-70mm (hopefully f2.8), so I think that's a
near cert.
I'm not so sure about them 'tinkering' with the much-loved FA ltds, but time will tell.
I also agree it would be easy enough to resurrect some of the older FA designs and 'red-ring' them, although people question how well they would perform on digital, and as I mention above, I wonder how their production capacity will handle too many new lenses going into production.