PentaxForums.com - View Single Post

*benjikan* · 02-14-2008, 12:15 AM

Originally Posted by Tom M

Hey Ben, what's your take on this review?

It seems they've copied the AF results from the K10D and simply applied it to the K20D. They say it's IQ is better than D300 yet the K20D numbers are higher than D3 when you read the PopPhoto D3 full review. They say that at all ISO the noise is worse than K10D. In one sentence they say it has the highest resolution below ISO 1600 and in the next they say up to ISO 1600. And it goes on and on like this..

What do you think?

I won't say what I think as I was attacked on that site for soliciting Pentax...I don't want to have to wash my mouth out with soap. Therefore No Comment.... No, I won't go there...It is a positive review yes, but "Just" enough stuff to not irritate their BIG ADVERTISERS.

I will say this..."Interesting Mis-Conceptions..."

Ben

02-14-2008, 12:15 AM	#21
benjikan Site Supporter Location: Paris, France Gallery Photos: 171 Posts: 3,402	Originally Posted by Tom M Hey Ben, what's your take on this review? It seems they've copied the AF results from the K10D and simply applied it to the K20D. They say it's IQ is better than D300 yet the K20D numbers are higher than D3 when you read the PopPhoto D3 full review. They say that at all ISO the noise is worse than K10D. In one sentence they say it has the highest resolution below ISO 1600 and in the next they say up to ISO 1600. And it goes on and on like this.. What do you think? I won't say what I think as I was attacked on that site for soliciting Pentax...I don't want to have to wash my mouth out with soap. Therefore No Comment.... No, I won't go there...It is a positive review yes, but "Just" enough stuff to not irritate their BIG ADVERTISERS. I will say this..."Interesting Mis-Conceptions..." Ben Last edited by benjikan; 02-14-2008 at 12:43 AM.