| Huh. I guess the industry I come from (computer software) must have higher standards than the photo magazine world. Or maybe there's just more possible sources of money. I can see smaller rags with no reputation to care about being swayed, but it seems like anyone with a recognizable name is best served by developing a reputation for being even-handed.
I suppose what you're saying explains what I said earlier — PopPhoto tends to be positive in all of its reviews — but I still am inclined to believe that they at least intend fairness. |