Originally Posted by codiac2600 
I personally think it's a positive review but there are some areas that they made big mistakes on their end.
They said the Sony A700 takes better images because of color accuracy, but in their own test on the A700 they rate to color worse than the Pentax 8.9 vs 7.9. It's bad book keeping on their end and it shouldn't happen. They also state the A700 shake reduction is slightly superior to the K20D which they give both a 3 stop advantage too so I'm not seeing the whole advantage here and what the heck does slightly superior mean? They do that a lot in the review using big words to make something just a tad different sound huge. But overall after reading it they basically say it's better than an A700 Canon 40D, but doesn't hold a candle to the D300 except in resolution.
I agree . Your assessment of the article is probably the most balanced I have seen yet. I saw that you posted at Dpreview as well.
Did you offend that person in a previous life or something. Wow. Maybe they just out of bed on the wrong side. Thanks for the essay by the way.