PentaxForums.com - View Single Post

RiceHigh · 02-15-2008, 12:24 AM

Originally Posted by lol101

If I read this review correctly, and compare it to D300, 40D or A700 from the same site, the K20D has considerably more noise at all ISO (heck, it has even more noise than K10...), slower AF, less color accuracy and jpeg quality at all ISO, a less efficient SR than the other stabilized body, a less interesting LV than the other cameras offering LV, a smaller screen, and it goes on...

The only thing they give it is a small advantage in resolution...

That's not a cold shower, it's a debacle... or a murder attempt...

Oh well... Pop Photo won't help sell K20D... next in line!

Everything in this planet is relative. And Yes, if we are to compare the test results which were obtained with the same yardstick..

02-15-2008, 12:24 AM	#38
RiceHigh Pentaxian Location: Hong Kong Gallery Photos: 0 Posts: 1,934	Comparison Originally Posted by lol101 If I read this review correctly, and compare it to D300, 40D or A700 from the same site, the K20D has considerably more noise at all ISO (heck, it has even more noise than K10...), slower AF, less color accuracy and jpeg quality at all ISO, a less efficient SR than the other stabilized body, a less interesting LV than the other cameras offering LV, a smaller screen, and it goes on... The only thing they give it is a small advantage in resolution... That's not a cold shower, it's a debacle... or a murder attempt... Oh well... Pop Photo won't help sell K20D... next in line! Everything in this planet is relative. And Yes, if we are to compare the test results which were obtained with the same yardstick..