Originally Posted by TourDeForce
Jay, I think the big difference may simply be the focal lengths. The 35mm is taking in more of the scene, so you're getting more lighting to average. A more even exposure simply because of the field of view.
Jim, interesting idea, that could be it. But I have noticed that the K 35 is very, very good
with color, I just haven't been able to pinpoint anything specific due to lack of comparitive
shots... Now I'm going to have to try more 35/50 comparisons...
__________________
K20D + K100D Super
DA* 50-135 f2.8 | DA 12-24 f4, 35ltd f2.8 Macro | FA 77ltd 1.8, 43 ltd 1.9 | F 50 1.7 | K 55 1.8, 35 3.5 | M 200 4, 135 3.5, 100 2.8, 85 2, 50 1.4, 28 2.8, 20 4 | Super Takumar 200 f4, 135 f3.5, 55 1.8, 50 1.4, 35 3.5 | Vivitar 28 2.8 Close Focus ("K2") | Tamron 28-75 2.8 XR LD Di , 70-200 2.8 LD Di Macro | Sigma 70 f/2.8 EX DG Macro
Last edited by jsherman999; 05-31-2008 at 11:03 PM..
|