View Single Post
Old 06-30-2008, 12:06 PM   #12
Gooshin
Pentaxian
 
Gooshin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toronto, the one in Canada.
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 2,596
Originally Posted by creampuff View Post
One shouldn't judge a lens simply by the printed specs alone.
There are other factors to consider like resolution, distortion correction, colour rendition, flare resistance, size, weight, build quality, ease of focusing, etc. Not to mention other more subjective criteria like prestige factor, re-sale value, rarity, value for money, warranty, etc..
thats all i'm asking really, if you believe that all of those factors will be high enough to justify the production of such a lens.

Originally Posted by creampuff View Post
Anyway going by the 7mm progression for Pentax prime lenses in the wide to normal range (14, 21, 28, 35, 43), there doesn't seem much point for me to consider the CZ Distagon. On the other hand the Sigma might be a strong contender in the superzoom category.
contender? dont they already have a bunch, particulary the 18-200 mm?? LOL
__________________
„¸¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨ „ø¤º°¨
¨°º¤ø„ OBAMA „ø¤º°¨
¸„ø¤º°¨2008 ``°º¤ø„¸
ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¨°º¤ø
Gooshin is offline   Reply With Quote