06-30-2008, 12:06 PM
|
#12
|
|
Pentaxian
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toronto, the one in Canada.
|
Originally Posted by creampuff
One shouldn't judge a lens simply by the printed specs alone.
There are other factors to consider like resolution, distortion correction, colour rendition, flare resistance, size, weight, build quality, ease of focusing, etc. Not to mention other more subjective criteria like prestige factor, re-sale value, rarity, value for money, warranty, etc..
thats all i'm asking really, if you believe that all of those factors will be high enough to justify the production of such a lens.
Originally Posted by creampuff
Anyway going by the 7mm progression for Pentax prime lenses in the wide to normal range (14, 21, 28, 35, 43), there doesn't seem much point for me to consider the CZ Distagon. On the other hand the Sigma might be a strong contender in the superzoom category.
contender? dont they already have a bunch, particulary the 18-200 mm?? LOL
__________________
„¸¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨ „ø¤º°¨
¨°º¤ø„ OBAMA „ø¤º°¨
¸„ø¤º°¨2008 ``°º¤ø„¸
ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¨°º¤ø
|
|
|