View Single Post
Old 07-15-2008, 09:08 AM   #18
Jim Royal
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Montreal
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 32
Originally Posted by Lowell Goudge View Post
I shoot JPEG and while adjustments are just as easy during PP as with RAW for WB, it is always better to start close, especially since JPEG is only 8 bit color not 12 as your RAW image
I would disagree on two counts:

First, the key difference between correcting WB in raw versus JPEG is that WB corrections in raw do not change any pixel values. A radical WB change in JPEG will likely introduce posterization, and not just because JPEG is 8-bit. It's because colour adjustments to JPEG images must necessarily change the image pixel.

Also, when using a dedicated photo-organizing tool such as Lightroom or Aperture, it is very fast to make WB corrections to a large number of photos. Before adopting Lightroom, I couldn't bear to shoot in raw because of the amount of additional work involved. Now, it's actually faster than shooting JPEG and using Photoshop alone.

So whens hooting, I simply guesstimate the correct WB setting in the camera (usually leaving it on either Auto or Tungsten), and fix it later.
Jim Royal is offline   Reply With Quote