Originally Posted by bwield
Starting to move towards a total prime Kit.
Currently I have the DA 21mm limited, FA 50mm macro and just sold my 16-45mm with the hopes of getting either the 40mm or 43mm limiteds..
My question is:
It seems that the consensus is that the 43mm limited is a little better overall, however is it worth the extra $200?
I'm sure that many answers will be "thats up to you" however I was hoping someone would humour me...
Please?
lol thanks for any and all input
I own both. I do not think the 43 is a better lens, just different. The 40 is sharper from edge to edge and the 43 is sharper in the center, rendering it perhaps more interesting for wide open portrait work. I.e. f 2.0 to f 2.8. the 40 is a brutally sharp lens across the entire spectrum.
Ben
