View Single Post
Old 08-04-2008, 10:51 PM   #48
Venturi
Site Supporter
 
Venturi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tulsa, OK
Gallery Photos: 4
Posts: 865
Originally Posted by Karn View Post
Points taken, and thanks for trying to help me in making the right decision.

I'll give the 16-45 some serious consideration. Since I really like nature/landscapes, but supposed to be worse at portraits.

Any tips on a good portrait lens? Maybe the 50mm f1.4 would serve me quite well for a low price?
Hey again Karn. After following this thread and watching you struggle with the decision I say just go ahead and get the camera w/ the kit and pick up the FA50 1.4 too. And start taking pictures!

Give the kit and the 50 a few weeks or so for you to get yourself wrapped around the whole DSLR thing and go from there. As you said you don't yet have a real idea of the difference between 40mm and 70mm; so get a camera in your hands and start finding things out. While you're at it go ahead and get a modest yet quality tripod with some of that "extra" money. You will never regret having a tripod, any tripod, but glass bought too soon with too little knowledge of yourself is a different story all together.

So for now, forget the 16-45 or the 16-50 or super zooms ad nauseum. Go get the dang camera and start shooting pictures.
__________________
- Jim
Resident Pain in the Aperture


My Gear
Venturi is offline   Reply With Quote