View Single Post
Old 08-06-2008, 09:38 AM   #7
ogl
Loyal Member
 
ogl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Siberia
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 653
I don't find 4/3 micro is very good idea. Compact - yes, light - yes. And it's all.
I will be happy with APS-C and FF from Pentax.
All system will have FF cameras, Oly invents bike.

As for me, it's just pre-announce. No real products. Need to wait and to see.
I think that Oly will have a small niche between cameras like LX3 and DSLR with micro 4/3 system. New prosumers with interchangeable lenses.

They have to make new line of lenses... I don't know if it's good or not.

The IQ of cameras will be lower than any APS-C's cameras. No doubts.
I think that Oly has to put more MP too in 4/3 sensor to sell it better.
I'm not sure that 12-14 МP camera of 4/3 micro with new lenses can make good results.

And I hate EVF and LV instead of optical VF. And what is about battery work in 4/3 micro cameras? EVF and LV have very high consumption.
Contrast AF is not very quick...
__________________
Pentax K200D,
FA*24/2 AL (IF), FA43/1.9 limited silver
A50/1.2, FA77/1.8 limited black, FA135/2.8 (IF)

Sony A300 kit, Minolta 85/1.4G

Last edited by ogl; 08-06-2008 at 10:29 AM..
ogl is offline   Reply With Quote