Originally posted by tuco No need. I don't get all upset if someone doesn't give a "glowing review" of the gear I use. And Hell hath no fury like a reviewer saying anything unfavorable about Ricoh/Pentax gear to its die-hard crowd!
It's only camera gear. No need to get all emotional about it.
OK, what's your angle in defending DxO on this?
They posted a review made up of old stuff, they aren't even interested in doing a proper review... this is clearly a case of the don't plan to support the camera, so they're discouraging their customers from buying it.
How is that in any way an emotional comment?
You seem to be portraying yourself as some kind of voice of reason, when in fact you're an apologist for a commercial company out to make a profit.
How is that the voice of reason?
What is your emotional attachment to this company that you feel you have to call people "emotional" or "all upset" or "over-reacting".
All you do is call names. At least I base my comments on why DxO is doing, not on some irrational evaluation of the mental state of someone I don't even know. Who's the one displaying irrational tendencies here? ... a little hint.. it's you dude.
Learn to call a spade a spade.... DxO isn't supporting the 645z or the lenses that go on it, if you buy one , they lose your business. It will cost them profits if you buy it, so they posted a half assed "review" designed to discredit it.
The irrational person isn't the one who describes accurately what they're doing, the irrational one is the one who can't see the truth.