View Single Post
Old 08-22-2008, 06:07 PM   #4
J.Scott
Site Supporter
 
J.Scott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada, eh!
Gallery Photos: 3
Posts: 2,091
Originally Posted by Nesster View Post
Oh don't be so hasty, after all the site had a major melt down... oh the withdrawal...

I have a 4490. Here are some tips with the Epson software -- I've since switched over to VueScan which is better but is also confusing as all hell. I still don't know how a lot of stuff works, it just does. LOL so I emphatize with you there.

First, you should scan at >300 DPI, I found 600, 800, 1200 were decent compromises between too large and time consuming vs. losing a bit of detail. At 300, which is a photo print quality scan, it's as though you're scanning a print the size of the negative. In post processing you can always re-size to what you need.

Auto balance & auto exposure sometimes is close enough, sometimes needs tweaking. If your software allows different settings or curves, try them out.

The ICE stuff is a mixed blessing: on the one hand it is effective, on the other sometimes the artifacts it produces are too much for a given photo. The artifacts include a general softening of the image, and sometimes streaky skies.

It occurs to me, I'm assuming your software is Epson... what software does Epson package with the V500?
For web viewing I agree that 300 dpi is more than adequate. However, for printing shouldn't I be scanning at a much higher dpi quotient?

The software appears to be the same that came with my older Model 3490. I also have Vuescan 8.4.47 which doesn't seem to be as sophisticated or complex as the Epson software. I need to experiment with both to compare the results. I see that the digital Ice does soften the image a bit, too; not always an effect I desire to achieve. I will probably just scan the image 'as is' and manipulate the image produced in Photoshop.
__________________

My Flickr account
J.Scott is offline   Reply With Quote