View Single Post
12-23-2008, 09:44 PM   #9
metroeloise
Loyal Member
 
Location: Washington
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 958
That is the questioin there

Originally Posted by mel View Post
I guess I work differently. I have Lightroom and CS4. If I take something into PhotoShop, I usually don't have a need to fiddle with it in LR again. I use LR for the prelims, basic photo editing, then if I need more I pop it in to PS and carry on from there. My LR copy is still there in LR but I treat my PS edit as and entirely different animal. I haven't had any reason to edit an image in LR after I've edited it in PS, unless I'm making a different version of the same image. In those cases I work with the LR version.
I can see saving the post PS into a directory and all but... If I am thinking correctly then if I return to Lr with the PS edited version then that version is included in the Lr data base and is also available for more versioning. This becomes a big deal as the handling of noise in one Huge reason to go to Ps. Eventually want to make composites and can see having Lr as a coordinator vis data base and tagging system being a good thing.

Then again the other part of the question is since there is Camera Raw and Bridge does it make redundant the use Lr at all. Just make it my business to learn how to do it all within Ps?


Originally Posted by tlfaust View Post
If you use a final sharpening and framing add-in in PS, for example, then the item would need to get re-imported into LR...

Sorry for the confusion
Yes this is what I am talking about. I do much that is low key and it will be better processed though Ps.

Any more ideas, Suggestions, Anecdotes?

Thank you.
metroeloise is offline