PentaxForums.com - View Single Post - Pentax slips to 1.6% japanese market share over 2008: 5th place!

deejjjaaaa · 01-10-2009, 07:28 PM

Originally Posted by Samsungian

Nikon and Canon have not put these 100K annual order requirements in place that Sony and Olympus and Pentax have. Lets say you own a business selling gear. Who you gonna carry? Oh, and Who runs ads in my local market place? Nikon and Canon. So why even bother with the other three brands?

in a staffing company, an employee who is billing @ $200/hr (think ERP) and an employee who is billing @ $20/hr (think some very low level accounting) both require on average the time from HR to support both... now if I can't outsource HR support more that I did already, I should reduce the time to support that $20/hr junk... or I will make a decision to quit from working positions where clients paying me $20/hr billing rate, because HR/sales/recruiting cost me money and if I don't have it at a level that for example AccounTemps does it makes me no good.

01-10-2009, 07:28 PM	#101
deejjjaaaa Pentaxian Location: steel city / rust belt Gallery Photos: 0 Posts: 1,447	Originally Posted by Samsungian Nikon and Canon have not put these 100K annual order requirements in place that Sony and Olympus and Pentax have. Lets say you own a business selling gear. Who you gonna carry? Oh, and Who runs ads in my local market place? Nikon and Canon. So why even bother with the other three brands? in a staffing company, an employee who is billing @ $200/hr (think ERP) and an employee who is billing @ $20/hr (think some very low level accounting) both require on average the time from HR to support both... now if I can't outsource HR support more that I did already, I should reduce the time to support that $20/hr junk... or I will make a decision to quit from working positions where clients paying me $20/hr billing rate, because HR/sales/recruiting cost me money and if I don't have it at a level that for example AccounTemps does it makes me no good.