PentaxForums.com - View Single Post - Pro Applications..Making 10.2 megapixels in to 30.6 mega pixels

*benjikan* · 04-18-2007, 12:56 PM

Originally Posted by amateur6

I'd wondered about something like this in the past (I'm an Art Director & Designer who does a lot of advertising and catalog work for Swiss Army) but never played with it. Still, it seems to me like it shouldn't do a better job than any other interpolation...

Process: Duplicate, free transform to reduce the duplicate's scale by 1 pixel (as ennacac said, does the direction matter?), repeat this for another, desaturated layer duplicate of the original... should both of the duplicates be set to "soft light"? What opacity?

I'll also echo kmccanta:

Thank you sir!

Interesting, I am also a Creative Director. Worked on "Dim", "Club Med", "Lancome" etc...I am not saying that it "IS" 30 megapixels, but think of the logic. It is kind of like the "Foveon" sensor, metaphorically speaking. I am basically thickening up the pixels three dimensionally.

04-18-2007, 12:56 PM	#24
benjikan Site Supporter Location: Paris, France Gallery Photos: 171 Posts: 3,402	Interesting Originally Posted by amateur6 I'd wondered about something like this in the past (I'm an Art Director & Designer who does a lot of advertising and catalog work for Swiss Army) but never played with it. Still, it seems to me like it shouldn't do a better job than any other interpolation... Process: Duplicate, free transform to reduce the duplicate's scale by 1 pixel (as ennacac said, does the direction matter?), repeat this for another, desaturated layer duplicate of the original... should both of the duplicates be set to "soft light"? What opacity? I'll also echo kmccanta: Thank you sir! Interesting, I am also a Creative Director. Worked on "Dim", "Club Med", "Lancome" etc...I am not saying that it "IS" 30 megapixels, but think of the logic. It is kind of like the "Foveon" sensor, metaphorically speaking. I am basically thickening up the pixels three dimensionally.