View Single Post
03-30-2009, 11:36 AM   #15
Gooshin
Pentaxian
 
Location: Toronto, the one in Canada.
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 4,859
if you read those reviews carefully, you should draw out 3 main points

1. actual resolution

2. effectiveness of dust/scratch removal hardware (if any)

3. processing speed

you will see that the Plustek has an effective resolution of ~3600 DPI, a lackluster dust removal design, and a 3-4 minute process time per frame, not to mention burdening you with insanely large files

conversly the Nikon 5000 has an effective resolution of ~3900 DPI vs its claimed 4000, a VERY good scratch removing algorythem (as experienced by me), and a process time of ~1 minute per frame.


this is where the cost comes in,

according to that site, the Epson V700's effective resolution is a mere ~2600 dpi and a Canon 8800F is a laughable ~1600 dpi

you get what you pay for, i for one, am very happy with the Nikon, even though it burned a sizable hole in my wallet.

Last edited by Gooshin; 03-30-2009 at 11:45 AM.
Gooshin is offline