I've been thinking about RAW + PP vs in-camera JPG with custom settings.
Sometimes i see a shot posted online with the the term "straight from camera no PP". In a lot of these cases the JPG has +contrast +saturation applied in camera. This compared to a RAW file has a lot more pop!
Is it really no PP if the camera has applied processing to the JPG? I know that this is just a matter of semantics but I consider it strange. If someone is posting the image as an example of the cameras JPG ability then fine. But often i get the impression that people are using the in-camera processing to brag about a particular lens.
Anyway... it's not really all that important just wondered what others thought. BTW, i think this was inspired by all the measurbating about the k7 beta camera.
mike