The first picture looked okay on my monitor at home, but now that I'm looking at it on another computer, it looks like it could use a slight saturation boost; or perhaps I need to bump the white balance a tad warmer.
Also, pixel peeping the last picture (the girl in the green knit sweater), I see that the focus is actually slightly forward, on her nose instead of her eyes. My Sigma 85mm is dead-on accurate, and when I get a situation like above, it usually means that either my subject moved her head slightly, or I moved slightly, after locking focus. That's how it goes sometimes when you're working with a fast telephoto that can produce razor-thin focal planes. The way focus is perfectly locked on the left eye on my subject in photo 2 is typical of this lens's accuracy.
I know the Pentax 85mm typically goes for more when one comes up for sale, but I wouldn't trade my Sigma for one. The Sigma is ridiculously sharp, has great bokeh, it's accurate, and the HSM is quick and silent.
---------- Post added 04-24-14 at 07:29 PM ----------
Originally posted by nicoprod Great portrait lens.
That first picture WOW, fantastic.
Thanks!
We've all heard photographers complain about people seeing their expensive gear and saying something like, "Wow, your camera must take great pictures!", disregarding the prominent role the photographer plays in getting a good picture. But with my Sigma 85mm, I kind of feel like it
really does take great pictures.
The pictures I get from it just have a certain sophisticated quality that I don't from most other lenses. I can use it in a fairly ordinary setting, and come away with pictures that are extraordinary. My Sigma 100-300mm f4 is probably similar in this regard, but I don't have occasion to deploy it nearly as often.
Last edited by Edgar_in_Indy; 04-24-2014 at 04:32 PM.