Yeah, the newer ones are supposedly just fine, ..I've got a survivor from the 80s that I'm not counting on being safe, (need to make an electronics friend locally or buy something to test it.) They're a good unit, though, cheap, powerful, reliable, and replaceable. A little bulky, but not heavy. There's no computer automation, just an 'electric eye' that'll try to give you a specified F-stop with a simple bit of circuitry. In practice, this works fine, and I've always been pleased to see this model survived.
'Back in the day,' I didn't consider Canon's dedicated flashes to really do anything useful until they finally came out with a TTL system for the T90, so I always swore by 283s (These, unfortunately, are not to share oxygen with digital cameras, their synch voltage is *insanely* high by modern standards) and 285s (meaning the 285HV : the 'high voltage' there doesn't refer to the synch voltage, but rather the power sources you could plug into them: this is probably why the synch isn't just an open circuit to your camera, though. )
Anyway, there's nothing fancy by today's standards in a 285, but they're generally predictable and consistent.
I'm still on the fence about what I'm doing myself for flashes with the Pentax digital: my one lament about having a K20 is it involved buying into the start of a flash system, where options are still limited. One thing I might do myself is to get the simplest, littlest model for automation and convenience, and a fresh 285 for when it's time to throw some heat.
