PentaxForums.com  

Go Back   PentaxForums.com > Pentax Photography > Everything Else

Everything Else Use this forum to talk about Pentax-related topics not covered in other sections, such as photo shoots, magazines, and rebates.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-27-2008, 07:35 AM   #16
Pentaxian
 
cupic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,970
To my IMHO the Pentax is a learning camera and the canon/nikon is so auto its shoots itself


cheers
__________________
"If your pictures aren't good enough,your not close enough"
Robert Capa and No my name not Robert just quoting someone
______________________________________________
cupic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2008, 12:45 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Durban, South Africa
Gallery Photos: 23
Posts: 114
Originally Posted by Eriks View Post
Hi, I'm a photography rookie, and I realise that the cost of lenses will make me bound to the brand I choose to invest in now.

For some reason I have a good feeling for Pentax, but I cannot explain this rationally. So maybe you can help my decision by telling me:

Why Pentax?

Why I should choose Pentax instead of Canon or Nikon or any other brand?

Thanks
If you can stand strong amongst the conformist C****n & N****n fan club with a different camera brand in your hands, cherish at not running with the "herd" want

a robust camera that can stand up to the elements,
lovely ergonomics, feature set and a stunning "kit/beginners" lens
OIS which definately is worth at least 3 stops in hand held shooting
incredibly priced "prime" lenses
just about impossible to get a "crap" picture in the right hands
best priced body - feature for feature - out there

then my friend you can stand proud to be a Pentaxian

d
dylansalt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2008, 01:30 PM   #18
Loyal Member
 
Wheatfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The wheatfields of Canada
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 992
Originally Posted by Eriks View Post
Hi, I'm a photography rookie, and I realise that the cost of lenses will make me bound to the brand I choose to invest in now.

For some reason I have a good feeling for Pentax, but I cannot explain this rationally. So maybe you can help my decision by telling me:

Why Pentax?

Why I should choose Pentax instead of Canon or Nikon or any other brand?

Thanks
Why Pentax?
Pentax lenses.
There really isn't another reason needed.
Wheatfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2008, 01:37 PM   #19
Pentaxian
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,184
Bang for the Buck

I bought my K10D in March of 2007. Here was the rational at the time:

95% of the "Bang" for 70% of the "Buck"

Here is the executive summary (full details below):
  • Feature set
  • Handling
  • Price

Tried Nikon D40/D80:
  • Liked the compactness
  • Liked the speed
  • Didn't like the lack of backward lens compatibility at that price point
  • Didn't like the cost of Nikon lenses
  • Didn't like the tinny feel of the kit lens, especially for manual focus

Tried the Canon Rebel XTi (?):
  • Didn't like the way the camera handled
  • Didn't like the tinny kit lens. Found out later that the performance is even worse than the build.

Sony Alpha:
  • Picked it up. Squeezed off a few shots. Set it back down and asked if they had Pentax

Heard about the K10D:
  • Handled a K100 and liked the feel. Was assured that the K10D was a little heavier, but handled much the same
  • Liked better build of kit lens (found out later that it is a good performer too)
  • Liked the backward lens compatibility
  • Like pentaprism rather than pentamirror
  • liked metal as opposed to plastic chassis
  • Like in-body SR
  • Liked sealed body
  • Liked the price (several hundred dollars less than either the Nikon or the Canon
  • Liked the glowing reviews

Again...
95% of the "Bang" for 70% of the "Buck"
This is still true for all the features that truly count.

Oh, yeah...there was aways the "underdog factor" too. I own two Ricoh film bodies (great features, low price), have bought four Mazdas new and owned a Sunbeam sports car in college rather than the ubiquitous (at the time) MGs and Triumphs. I also tend to favor odd-ball lens choices...go figure.

Steve

P.S. Regarding the Ricoh film bodies...I went with Ricoh back when Pentax was one of the top three brands. Ricoh simply had the same/better feature set as a much lower price. Sorry Spotmatic and ME Super fan boys.
__________________
Pentax K10D :: Pentax-M 200/4 :: Tamron 70-150/3.5 (Adaptall-2) :: LZOS MC Jupiter-9 85/2 :: Pentax-A 50/1.7 :: Pentax-M 50/1.7 :: Sigma 50/2.8 EX DG Macro :: Auto-Rikenon 50/1.7 (M42) :: Pentax-FA 35/2 :: Tamron 28/2.5 (Adaptall-2) :: Pentax-DA 18-55/3.5-5.6 :: KMZ MC Zenitar 16/2.8 :: Pentax Bellows-K
stevebrot is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2008, 04:08 PM   #20
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vestfold, Norway
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 65
I went for Pentax because I didn't want to be one of those guys who buy their dSLR's at Elkjøp.
I like the Pentax brand name, they are the underdog and I found out after I bought my K10D that Pentax has the best price/quality when it comes to lenses. Love Pentax prime's

If you haven't bought a Pentax dSLR? Check out these links:

Scandinavianphoto, K20D body - 7695,-NOK (about 1400USD)


Prodigital2000, K20D body - 1044,-USD (about 6500,- NOK)

I recommend that you buy camera body at Scandinavianphoto or Japan Foto in Norway. Buy lenses and flash at prodigital2000. Have bought lenses, flash and more from them and saved over 1500USD

Both of my K10D's are bought used. One from Foto.no and the other one from ebay. Buy used and use your money on glas

Final tip; don't use akam.no This place is much better, thrust me.
__________________
PENTAX K-m, ZX-5, 35/2.0, 50/1.4, 70/2.4, AF-540fgz*2
Sigma SD-14 + Sigma 17-70/2.8-4.5

Last edited by NorthPentax; 08-28-2008 at 01:57 AM..
NorthPentax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2008, 09:08 PM   #21
Site Supporter
 
Damn Brit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oakland, CA
Gallery Photos: 70
Posts: 4,333
Because people look at you and say "oh, you've got a Pentax".
DARE TO BE DIFFERENT
__________________
Gary is my name.
Canadian by adoption eh.


My forum gallery pics here: http://www.pentaxforums.com/gallery/...lbum-5983.html
Damn Brit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2008, 09:41 PM   #22
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,143
Originally Posted by Damn Brit View Post
Because people look at you and say "oh, you've got a Pentax".
DARE TO BE DIFFERENT
It hurts peoples heads. Especially when they realize its a dlsr.
Blue is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 12:30 AM   #23
Administrator
 
Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Gallery Photos: 48
Posts: 2,938
Originally Posted by Eriks View Post
Hi, I'm a photography rookie, and I realise that the cost of lenses will make me bound to the brand I choose to invest in now.

For some reason I have a good feeling for Pentax, but I cannot explain this rationally. So maybe you can help my decision by telling me:

Why Pentax?

Why I should choose Pentax instead of Canon or Nikon or any other brand?

Thanks
Pentax has a long-standing history of outstanding glass. If you can get your hands on an older FA* lens, or an A* lens, coupled with a K20D, you're looking at some of the best image quality out there. The DA*'s are very good as well.

Here are a couple of photos I produced using the lenses below: Greenland photos!

While in Greenland, I participated in a photo workshop hosted by a company in New York; many photos taken my the other members' Canon or Nikon cameras fell short in sharpness and color compared to the Pentax shots. In my option, though, half of everything is the person behind the lens!



__________________
Adam - Site Webmaster

PentaxForums.com Usage Guide

Enjoying the site? Help cover server costs by donating or getting some bumper stickers!
Adam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 05:32 AM   #24
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Norway
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 4
Hi again!

Thanks for all your thoughs and inputs.
And methaphors... I've never been a Mazda fan, but I've always been fond of Land Rovers. They are not fast, but different and durable. 70% of the Land Rovers ever produced are still on the road, and parts are easily available for even the oldest models.

The backwards compability is such a great benefit. This means that the lenses are not a short term investment, but a long one. I really like that. Secondly, I like metal better than plastic. Built to withstand the elements it seems like a Pentax camera is a better choice when going off the beaten track. Then the quality of the lenses... I've seen some of your magnificent photos, and I do not think any other brand can perform better.

So, dear Pentaxians, I'm convinced. As a start I've purchased a K200D with a DA 18-250 for travelling. The kit should arrive here by mail next week. In addition I've ordered two primes from a New York shop - the FA 31 and 77 limiteds. This deal saved me approx. 1500 dollars compared to buying these at home.

Eriks
Eriks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 05:59 AM   #25
Site Supporter
 
Peter Zack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East Coast Canada
Gallery Photos: 61
Posts: 5,107
I think you'll be happy with the Kit. Then you'll be in for a real treat when the 31 and 77mm's arrive. Both beautiful lenses. I'm looking forward to hearing your thoughts on the new gear and seeing some of the pictures from it.
__________________
http://photographyandhowto.blogspot.com/
http://peiweddingphotography.googlepages.com/home
http://www.themesoftime.com/Gallery.aspx
Look and think before opening the shutter. The heart and mind are the true lens of the camera.
- Yousuf Karsh
Peter Zack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 10:08 AM   #26
Pentaxian
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,184
I will second Peter's assessment. Great kit. I think you will be very pleased with your results!

Steve
__________________
Pentax K10D :: Pentax-M 200/4 :: Tamron 70-150/3.5 (Adaptall-2) :: LZOS MC Jupiter-9 85/2 :: Pentax-A 50/1.7 :: Pentax-M 50/1.7 :: Sigma 50/2.8 EX DG Macro :: Auto-Rikenon 50/1.7 (M42) :: Pentax-FA 35/2 :: Tamron 28/2.5 (Adaptall-2) :: Pentax-DA 18-55/3.5-5.6 :: KMZ MC Zenitar 16/2.8 :: Pentax Bellows-K
stevebrot is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 07:57 PM   #27
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 46
I chose Pentax because I found a DSLR and kit lens for $430. I knew nothing about DSLRs. Since then, I've gotten lenses and Pentax equipment and gotten somewaht attached. But I've also considered switching to nikon. But I haven't. Why? Click the link on my signature. Those tiny specs that dpreview.com picks on don't matter at all.

Read my signature link
__________________
Your Camera Doesn't Matter!

K10D | *ist DL | Sigma 50/2.8 Macro | 18-55 | Takumar 300/4 | K55/2 | 2x TC | Vivitar 285HV | Vivitar 4600
Big I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 08:57 PM   #28
Pentaxian
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,184
Originally Posted by Big I View Post
I chose Pentax because I found a DSLR and kit lens for $430. I knew nothing about DSLRs. Since then, I've gotten lenses and Pentax equipment and gotten somewaht attached. But I've also considered switching to nikon. But I haven't. Why? Click the link on my signature. Those tiny specs that dpreview.com picks on don't matter at all.

Read my signature link
I followed your link and found another gem...

http://junkstorecameras.com/

The cool thing is that I have taken pictures with several of the featured models! (Three to be exact!)

Steve
__________________
Pentax K10D :: Pentax-M 200/4 :: Tamron 70-150/3.5 (Adaptall-2) :: LZOS MC Jupiter-9 85/2 :: Pentax-A 50/1.7 :: Pentax-M 50/1.7 :: Sigma 50/2.8 EX DG Macro :: Auto-Rikenon 50/1.7 (M42) :: Pentax-FA 35/2 :: Tamron 28/2.5 (Adaptall-2) :: Pentax-DA 18-55/3.5-5.6 :: KMZ MC Zenitar 16/2.8 :: Pentax Bellows-K
stevebrot is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 10:25 PM   #29
Site Supporter
 
Damn Brit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oakland, CA
Gallery Photos: 70
Posts: 4,333
OP, welcome aboard, you've got a good kit to start with. I look for to you posting some shots.
__________________
Gary is my name.
Canadian by adoption eh.


My forum gallery pics here: http://www.pentaxforums.com/gallery/...lbum-5983.html
Damn Brit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 06:52 AM   #30
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Barrie, ON Can
Gallery Photos: 1
Posts: 75
Originally Posted by Kelvin Klein View Post
There is an interesting pentax advertisement. I hope this helps.

http://www.pentaxian.com/pdf/ads/PEN...usy_Poster.pdf
I remember that ad! I think it was in a Pop Photo a while back! I think thats why I bought a K100D at the time. I was looking at a D40 but it felt like a toy and didn't have a focus motor inside. Then I read that ad, walked into a store, they had the K100D on sale plus 10% off. The rest they say, is history!
__________________
Tyler. PENTAX K100D, Cosina K-28mm f2.8, FA 50mm f1.4, Magnum k-135mm f2.8, 18-55mm, 50-200mm, manfrotto tripod, A couple of accessories
Tb Photos Flickr Stream
Tb Photos
Tb Photos blog
ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:50 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.