<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>PentaxForums.com - Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</title>
		<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/</link>
		<description>Discuss any Pentax K-mount, screwmount, or medium format SLR lens, as well as filters and attachments.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:13:13 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>30</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lens "haze" worse at certain apertures?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80801-lens-haze-worse-certain-apertures.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:03:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[So I bought a couple of older (late 70's, early 80's) lenses on fleabay recently, and one has an optical problem that has me stumped. 
 
I will post photos when I get home tonight, but it appears to have a...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>So I bought a couple of older (late 70's, early 80's) lenses on fleabay recently, and one has an optical problem that has me stumped.<br />
<br />
I will post photos when I get home tonight, but it appears to have a &quot;haze&quot; that I can see in images (as a low contrast, bright spot) <b>but here is the weird part</b>; the effect of the haze is most prominent between f8-f16, with a peak at f11. Shoot above or below these apertures and the image contrast ramps back up and the bright spot disappears (along with expected changes in the DOF, etc.).<br />
<br />
At f4 or f22 (the extremes of the range), the image has no problems at all! So I don't think this is diffraction, but is it a haze, or some other damage in the lens?<br />
<br />
NB: the lens itself has a &quot;ding&quot; on the front element near the edge that doesn't seem to be more than multi-coating deep...<br />
<br />
Otherwise, sharp as a tack and *huge* focus throw. Any ideas?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>panoguy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80801-lens-haze-worse-certain-apertures.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>18-55mm WR compared to the original 18-55mm kit lens</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80778-18-55mm-wr-compared-original-18-55mm-kit-lens.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:57:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I am considering to buy the new 18-55mm WR lens and was wondering how it compares to the original 18-55mm Pentax kit lens? How is the optical quality?  
I was never excited about the original kit lens and I...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I am considering to buy the new 18-55mm WR lens and was wondering how it compares to the original 18-55mm Pentax kit lens? How is the optical quality? <br />
I was never excited about the original kit lens and I have never tried any of the versions that came out later.<br />
So if someone has the original kit lens and also the new WR, I would appreciate any advice if it's worth buying one.<br />
<br />
I just want a real light lens for hiking and the Weather resistance might be helpful too if I have it on the K20D once in a while.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>HogRider</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80778-18-55mm-wr-compared-original-18-55mm-kit-lens.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[It's alive!! bwahahahahahahaha!]]></title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80775-its-alive-bwahahahahahahaha.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:32:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Sorry about the title.  
 
I've bought and repaired quite a few lenses recently and thought I'd give a conversion from one mount to another a try. So I was looking around for some Olympus OM lenses (register...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Sorry about the title. <br />
<br />
I've bought and repaired quite a few lenses recently and thought I'd give a conversion from one mount to another a try. So I was looking around for some Olympus OM lenses (register distance close to K-mount=easy conversion), but then I found a Vivitar Close Focus 2/28mm in Canon FD-mount for BIN £19.90 and without much thought I bought it. I knew there was a pretty big difference in register distances (M42/PK 45.46mm vs FD 42mm) but I thought I'd give it a go.<br />
<br />
So after the packet from UK reached Finland I had myself a used but fully working Vivitar Close Focus 2/28mm with a filter with the sellers fingerprint on it:D<br />
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2533/4119243003_d32abbe3a2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2716/4119244491_3a249f5f8b.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Then I chose an &quot;organ donor&quot; to get a mount from. An M42 Praktica 4.5/80-200mm Auto Zoom with hazy inner elements was my choice as it's mount part was about the same diameter as the Vivitar.<br />
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2726/4120017628_274ffab915.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
to be continued...</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>ovim</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80775-its-alive-bwahahahahahahaha.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>18-50mm Sigma F2,8 mac w/K100Super</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80734-18-50mm-sigma-f2-8-mac-w-k100super.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:54:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>My daughter took that after some attempt with an active cat. She did that with no flash indoor with very little DoF 
 
 
 
Image: http://www.pbase.com/danieltong/image/119508198/original.jpg</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>My daughter took that after some attempt with an active cat. She did that with no flash indoor with very little DoF<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.pbase.com/danieltong/image/119508198/original.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
I tried that lens in DC area which is pretty much very close in character with my Sigma 24-60mm<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Daniel</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>danielchtong</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80734-18-50mm-sigma-f2-8-mac-w-k100super.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Repairing a stuck focus ring on pentax-m?</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80733-repairing-stuck-focus-ring-pentax-m.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:53:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Anyone experienced with this? A M50/1.4 I purchased recently developed a stuck focus that will only rotate between the ~.58 m and the 0.45m mark on the focus ring (where the stopper for the closest focus is)....</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Anyone experienced with this? A M50/1.4 I purchased recently developed a stuck focus that will only rotate between the ~.58 m and the 0.45m mark on the focus ring (where the stopper for the closest focus is). :(  The focus was smooth when I received it, but it got stuck the first time I tried shooting something close.  The seller offered me a refund, but the optics look great and I'd like to try to repair it.  Does anyone have any experience or tips on this?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>flmz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80733-repairing-stuck-focus-ring-pentax-m.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SMA Pentax-A 1:1.7 50mm  or  SMC Pentax M 1:1.7 50 mm</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80712-sma-pentax-1-1-7-50mm-smc-pentax-m-1-1-7-50-mm.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:45:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Going to sell one.  Which one to keep?  The "M" feels like a little more substantial lens in terms of glass, but the IQ seems about the same.  Obviously the "A" is more convenient in Av mode.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Going to sell one.  Which one to keep?  The &quot;M&quot; feels like a little more substantial lens in terms of glass, but the IQ seems about the same.  Obviously the &quot;A&quot; is more convenient in Av mode.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>mrpackerguy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80712-sma-pentax-1-1-7-50mm-smc-pentax-m-1-1-7-50-mm.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rokinon/Samyang 85mm - still good?</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80699-rokinon-samyang-85mm-still-good.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:54:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi all, 
 
I've been doing a bit of searching around for details and it seems like the Rokinon (or Samyang or etc etc.) 85mm F1.4 is a heck of a steal in terms of image quality and, for the most part, build...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi all,<br />
<br />
I've been doing a bit of searching around for details and it seems like the Rokinon (or Samyang or etc etc.) 85mm F1.4 is a heck of a steal in terms of image quality and, for the most part, build quality as well.<br />
<br />
I had a chance to try one in Japan not knowing what it was until I left (and could not return. it was hidden somewhere in Harajuku...) but didn't end up buying it as I needed the cash for food and japanese vending machines. True story ;)<br />
<br />
Anyways, it was a pretty good lens and after reading all the rave reviews and seeing the prices they go for, I have now come to re-consider it as I'd like to put some finishing touches to my 'low light portraiture' ultimate lens lineup.<br />
<br />
Currently, I have the Sigma 30mm F1.4 and the Pentax DA*55 F1.4. The Samyang 85mm F1.4 seems to be a perfect lens for my purposes, considering I rarely shoot F22 landscapes.<br />
<br />
<br />
My question is in regards to the reliability of this lens. I've heard of some isolated cases of apertures sticking either initially or after a few months. For those who own the lens: Is yours still working? Is there stuff I should look out for when purchasing this lens?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>dugrant153</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80699-rokinon-samyang-85mm-still-good.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Questions on fast 50s</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80687-questions-fast-50s.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:33:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hello, 
 
  I have the A50mm f1.7 and it is becoming my default lens. I love it!  I am fixing an A50 f2 and I just purchased an M50mm  f1.4 which is on its way.    
I will test it for myself eventually but I...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hello,<br />
<br />
  I have the A50mm f1.7 and it is becoming my default lens. I love it!  I am fixing an A50 f2 and I just purchased an M50mm  f1.4 which is on its way.   <br />
I will test it for myself eventually but I have a question:<br />
We all know lenses are softer wide open and start to sharpen up as they close up.  <br />
Having these 3 lenses: Would the f1.4 be sharper at f2 than the f1.7 at f2?<br />
Would the f1.4 be sharper at say f3.5 than the other 2 at the same aperture?<br />
Just curious. I will eventually do the test myself when I get my hands at all three.<br />
Why so many 50's?  Have you heard of  LBA? :p<br />
<br />
Thanks,</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>ismaelg</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80687-questions-fast-50s.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Quantaray 100-300</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80684-quantaray-100-300-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:00:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I am assembling a used kit for my daughter. This will be a Christmas gift and her first DSLR. I already have purchased a *istDS and a DA L 18-55mm lens. 
 
I just sent payment for a used Quantaray 100-300mm, I...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I am assembling a used kit for my daughter. This will be a Christmas gift and her first DSLR. I already have purchased a *istDS and a DA L 18-55mm lens.<br />
<br />
I just sent payment for a used Quantaray 100-300mm, I wanted her to have a long lens also. I'm a bit concerned about it because I see mixed reviews. Some say its a piece o crap, others says it great for the money. I know you get what you pay for but is this a good beginner's lens? is it that some examples are good and some are not?<br />
<br />
I will encourage her to upgrade as soon as she can, but I dont want her crippled right out of the gate.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>skid2964</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80684-quantaray-100-300-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Insuring lenses?</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80679-insuring-lenses.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:13:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Now that I will soon own a FA 31mm, I am curious - do people insure their lenses? If so, whom do you approach for such insurance? Sorry for a pretty broad question.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Now that I will soon own a FA 31mm, I am curious - do people insure their lenses? If so, whom do you approach for such insurance? Sorry for a pretty broad question.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>pentaman</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80679-insuring-lenses.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lens identification help needed</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80670-lens-identification-help-needed.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:59:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Am I correct in assuming that this is version 1 of the Super-Takumar 135mm 3.5? As you can see, two of the three markers are present..... the serial number & existence of the f:4 aperture marker puts it in the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Am I correct in assuming that this is version 1 of the Super-Takumar 135mm 3.5? As you can see, two of the three markers are present..... the serial number &amp; existence of the f:4 aperture marker puts it in the correct era, but for some reason there is no model number on the underside of the auto/manual switch, which would be the definitive marker.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:4px">

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<div style="padding:3px">
			<img class="attach" src="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/attachments/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/47753d1258646172-lens-identification-help-needed-135ver1300a.jpg" border="0" alt="" />&nbsp;<img class="attach" src="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/attachments/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/47754d1258646172-lens-identification-help-needed-135ver1300b.jpg" border="0" alt="" />&nbsp;
			</div>
		</fieldset>
	

	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>raymeedc</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80670-lens-identification-help-needed.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ever buy a lens on Ebay...</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80665-ever-buy-lens-ebay.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:18:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>without much description of the condition other than the glass was good? Too late to ask questions because time was up.  Thinking, for the money, I will probably get a workable lens.  And then it shows up and...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>without much description of the condition other than the glass was good? Too late to ask questions because time was up.  Thinking, for the money, I will probably get a workable lens.  And then it shows up and has never been out of the box.  Not a speck of dust.  Not a single scratch.  Perfect.<br />
<br />
Jackpot.  <br />
<br />
Score one MINT A-50mm f1.7 that is beautiful!  $70 delivered might be too much for a beater but it was a steal for a brand new lens.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>J-Rod</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80665-ever-buy-lens-ebay.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sigma 35-70</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80653-sigma-35-70-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:25:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Recently purchased this very inexpensive ($14.00) lens - a Sigma manual focus, auto aperture 35-70mm, F2.8-4. It takes fine photos, colors and contrast not great, but certainly great for the price! 
 
Two...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Recently purchased this very inexpensive ($14.00) lens - a Sigma manual focus, auto aperture 35-70mm, F2.8-4. It takes fine photos, colors and contrast not great, but certainly great for the price!<br />
<br />
Two questions about this lens:<br />
<br />
1. Although it does indicate F2.8 on the aperture ring, when the lens is set to auto, my K-m will only allow it to go as far as F 4 (no matter what focal length). How do I use F 2.8 and auto?<br />
<br />
2. Anyone else ever used this lens, have any tips or suggestions?<br />
<br />
Thanks!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>mole</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80653-sigma-35-70-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>What size lens hood for DA L 55-300?</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80619-what-size-lens-hood-da-l-55-300-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:00:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello, 
 
I believe the normal DA 55-300 uses a 58mm. Does the DA L version use the same size? 
 
I noticed the DA and DA L 55-200 use different sizes so that's why I'm not assuming both versions of the 55-300...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hello,<br />
<br />
I believe the normal DA 55-300 uses a 58mm. Does the DA L version use the same size?<br />
<br />
I noticed the DA and DA L 55-200 use different sizes so that's why I'm not assuming both versions of the 55-300 use the same size.<br />
<br />
Thanks.<br />
Bill M</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>DSLRnoob</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80619-what-size-lens-hood-da-l-55-300-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Purty flower and leaves- something wrong...</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80617-purty-flower-leaves-something-wrong.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:35:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I got a new lens on ebay, the SMC M 50mm 1.7 pentax unit. Its an awesome little lens!  
 
Anyways, I took some practice shots today of some up close and low f stop photos. I need help though, especially with...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I got a new lens on ebay, the SMC M 50mm 1.7 pentax unit. Its an awesome little lens! <br />
<br />
Anyways, I took some practice shots today of some up close and low f stop photos. I need help though, especially with the flower. It doesn't seem right.  Thanks<br />
<br />
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2500/4115773293_79cbed8d3a.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2772/4116554746_43eebdf7cc.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Dynasty</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80617-purty-flower-leaves-something-wrong.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Limited Lens Recommendation</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80607-limited-lens-recommendation.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:17:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I have the 21mm DA, the 55mm DA*, am getting the 77mm FA. 
I am looking at the 35mm, 40mm DAs, or the 43mm FA. 
Considerations: 
1) I don't have a macro yet, but don't see 35mm as the ideal FL for that, it...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have the 21mm DA, the 55mm DA*, am getting the 77mm FA.<br />
I am looking at the 35mm, 40mm DAs, or the 43mm FA.<br />
Considerations:<br />
1) I don't have a macro yet, but don't see 35mm as the ideal FL for that, it would be an asset, though.<br />
2) compact size matters, but does not overrule. I see the 77mm as a fairly compact lens, same as the 55mm, and the 21mm is downright dwarfy by my standards. IQ is more important.<br />
3) I don't really believe that Pentax will produce a FF camera, so having FF is not that critical. I do like faster rather than slower lenses, however.<br />
4) Price doesn't matter very much, none of this is needed, and will be bought as circumstances allow.<br />
Looking forward to ideas and experiences with the above lenses...</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Helmut_S</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80607-limited-lens-recommendation.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Best place to buy...</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80598-best-place-buy.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:52:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Best place to buy K-x body only? 
 
I've been contemplating a K-x with a 55-300(none kit) because I don't want to  bother with the stripped downed version. And so I decided to go for a body only and a 55-300...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Best place to buy K-x body only?<br />
<br />
I've been contemplating a K-x with a 55-300(none kit) because I don't want to  bother with the stripped downed version. And so I decided to go for a body only and a 55-300 separately. However, I'm finding that most body only prices are just as high as the basic 18-55 kits :eek:<br />
<br />
Does anyone know if there is a reputable with decent K-x body prices or is this how just how it is typa thing?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>JohnBee</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80598-best-place-buy.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Restoring an old friend: 50mm f2</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80592-restoring-old-friend-50mm-f2.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello, 
 
     I've had this lens for a few years but didn't use it much because it had dust and some fungus inside.  I have some experience disasembling cheaper lenses so last week I decided to give it a try...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hello,<br />
<br />
     I've had this lens for a few years but didn't use it much because it had dust and some fungus inside.  I have some experience disasembling cheaper lenses so last week I decided to give it a try to this one.  After all, this is most likely the most common 50mm lens in Pentax history.<br />
<br />
<b>Before</b>: fungus (or mold) was behind the aperture blades and the most dust behind the front element. <br />
<img src="http://images54.fotki.com/v555/photos/4/1233394/8163544/IMGP0742b-vi.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
 <br />
<img src="http://images53.fotki.com/v425/photos/4/1233394/8163544/IMGP0743b-vi.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
 <br />
<b>During surgery</b>.<br />
<img src="http://images53.fotki.com/v420/photos/4/1233394/8163544/IMGP0754b-vi.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
 <br />
<b>The end result</b>:<br />
<img src="http://images53.fotki.com/v432/photos/4/1233394/8163544/IMGP0765b-vi.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
 <br />
<img src="http://images53.fotki.com/v426/photos/4/1233394/8163544/IMGP0766b-vi.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
 <br />
Test with the K100DS. Absolutely no PP. Straight from the camera.<br />
1/800 @ f8.0<br />
<img src="http://images52.fotki.com/v644/photos/4/1233394/8163544/IMGP0757-vi.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
 <br />
Click here for the  full size pic:<a href="http://images52.fotki.com/v644/fileIjuu/9cd8e/4/1233394/8163544/IMGP0757.jpg" target="_blank">http://images52.fotki.com/v644/fileI...4/IMGP0757.jpg</a><br />
 <br />
I feel like getting a new lens for free :)<br />
<br />
What do you think?<br />
<br />
Thanks,</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>ismaelg</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80592-restoring-old-friend-50mm-f2.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Yet another mirror lens curiosity</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80585-yet-another-mirror-lens-curiosity.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:46:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I have been fiddling around with the thought of acquiring a mirror lens, in the 500mm. 
Any thoughts as to what brand is good aside from the always expensive Tamron 55BB? 
There are so many brands around that...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have been fiddling around with the thought of acquiring a mirror lens, in the 500mm.<br />
Any thoughts as to what brand is good aside from the always expensive Tamron 55BB?<br />
There are so many brands around that it just makes me dizzy trying to google them all and comparing them.<br />
In any case, non of the reviews I have come across tells about a brand that produces good results apart from the Tamron.<br />
I have read about the Sigma 600mm but non has been conclusive and it is also one lens that is hard to come by.<br />
Any thoughts?<br />
Don't say just get a regular glass lens as this is better than the mirror lenses, but this not about regular glass lens inquiry or thread.<br />
Anyone here have real experiences with mirror lenses and particular brands?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>GerryL</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80585-yet-another-mirror-lens-curiosity.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A*300/4 or FA*300/4.5?</title>
			<link>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80584-300-4-fa-300-4-5-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:43:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[So, there am I. In about a month it's my birthday. And I can choose a long lens for my K20d. I know, there are many threads on long lenses, and people asking which to choose. But I did not find a recent one...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>So, there am I. In about a month it's my birthday. And I can choose a long lens for my K20d. I know, there are many threads on long lenses, and people asking which to choose. But I did not find a recent one with the A*300.<br />
<br />
So, this is my question: if I wanted a lens for wildlife and birding, and I had to choose between the A*300/4 and the FA*300/4.5, which should I buy? And why? Which teleconverters can be used with these two lenses? Or did you find a better one (at about the same price :D)?<br />
<br />
Thanks!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/">Pentax SLR Lens Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Rense</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/80584-300-4-fa-300-4-5-a.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
