Looks fairly similar to my cheapie, which took a bit of a bend last winter when it saved me from a spill, (Actually, the bowing of it makes it steadier than it was, but I can no longer collapse it) ...is it good and rigid?
For holding my K-7 w/DA*300 & etc... yes, it offers much steadier support than a hand-hold. At 12oz it seems as solid as my 30oz monopod w/quick release head.
Keep in mind, it is what it is... a light weight, easy to carry and deploy, hunter's shooting stick designed to help support a high-powered rifle for a long distance shot... not a human. It seems well built, but if used carelessly , or for a purpose it was not designed , it's possible to ruin it.
Heehee, yeah. My little near-mishap was a little beyond the parameters of my expected use of the thing: it caught nearly my entire weight, and at a bad angle. I actually have an idea for something for times when I really need something to put some weight on, (We bandy about the idea of Derby cane handles: it'd be nice to find one that'd extend fairly tall for camera support in a pinch, as well)
I'm still partial to the Trek Pod, the cheaper one that doesn't telescope shorter than 48". I have on occasion been in a situation when I needed to put my full weight on it and I won't trust those twist locks to hold my weight.
Oh, that's a great idea, only the darn thing's backwards.
The *ball* should be on the monopod so you can walk with it, and the cup to go on the camera. Happen to have a tripod-threaded ball, too. (they come with some cheap shooting sticks and walking staffs, as it happens. ) Now... for some lathe time.
Or... Wait a minute. If I put a thumbscrew through the cap to an aspirin bottle, I have what will do the same sort of thing. Neat.
Last edited by Ratmagiclady; 11-06-2009 at 10:34 PM.
That "Ball and Cup" looks like an accident waiting to happen!
The Manfrotto quick release is fast and very easy to use.
I have one of these on my monopod and recommend it: Manfrotto 234RC Tilt Head with QR
Chris
I suppose that's a point. I have habits from using one of those 'Y' crooks that mean I wouldn't worry about dropping the thing, but I otherwise never use a head of any kind on a monopod, so I wouldn't get confused.
I was thinking last night that a cool thing about having the ball on the camera is that you could just brace on any surface at all, that way, and have a range of motion. My idea of putting the ball on the monopod was so that it could also function as a cane. I actually really like the idea in some ways, though. I had thought by now I'd be out doing some concert shooting a lot more down here, which hasn't happened so much, but with a ball and cup arrangement like that, it could be cool. One of my ideas was, if the venue's appropriate, have my monopod, extend it part way, and just take a seat here and there. This'd be pretty mobile. And I can make my reversed cheap knockoff easily since I already have this wooden ball.
Last edited by Ratmagiclady; 11-07-2009 at 02:14 PM.