PentaxForums.com  

Go Back   PentaxForums.com > Pentax Photography > Everything Else

Everything Else Use this forum to talk about Pentax-related topics not covered in other sections, such as photo shoots, magazines, and rebates.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-18-2008, 12:07 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
montezuma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Jersey
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 42
Fastest way to upload pics

Is it faster to use a card reader to upload pictures or to use an usb cable linked to your camera?
montezuma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008, 12:15 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 78
usually a card reader is faster YMMV
__________________
Best regards,
Roger
rogerstg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008, 12:20 PM   #3
Pentaxian
 
Gooshin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toronto, the one in Canada.
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 2,231
i put my camera in through a USB port

2 gigs empty out in about 2 minutes

but thats a camera limitation, as my external HD's transfer much faster than that through the same USB openning.
__________________
- please criticize any or all photos that i post on this site!

- if it doesn't work, hit it, if it doesn't break, hit it again.
Gooshin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008, 12:54 PM   #4
Loyal Member
 
ll_coffee_lP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 528
My card reader is much faster.

c[_]
__________________
http://mephotography.wordpress.com - Our photo blog/website --- check us out!
ll_coffee_lP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008, 04:26 PM   #5
Loyal Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Madison
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 534
I use an internal card reader...it's cleaner plus I don't take up an external USB port and have to find the cable all the time.

Also don't have to find a secure place to set the camera while it's doing its thing. Personal preference, but it's something to think about. Speeds are probably close, with the edge to a reader.
__________________
K10D | D-BG2 | Vivitar 28/2.5 | Tamron SP Macro 90/2.5 + SP 2x Tele | Zenitar 16/2.8 | FA 80-320/slow | A 24-50/4 | Sears 55/1.4
Proud MF'er Manual Focus Forum
Join us to fight "LBA" and post some pix. Together, let's get creative with what we've got.
ryan s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 08:43 AM   #6
Loyal Member
 
rfortson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston TX
Gallery Photos: 3
Posts: 846
USB2 card reader is usually faster than the camera, and a firewire card reader is the fastest.
__________________
Russ (in) Houston
My Flickr gallery
My Pentax Photogallery
Even bad photography can be fun!
rfortson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 09:45 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Melb. Aust
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 206
I usually use the USB cable because I leave it connected to the computer and just plug the camera in. Taking the card out involves more effort and time as I have to open a door on the PC to insert it. Transfer speed wise doesn't really concern me as I usually walk away and do something else if there are heaps of files to transfer.

If I have only one days shooting on the card (which is usually the case) I use a little program called 'transferrer' that copies the files to a new folder created for todays date under a folder I've specified (eg 2008). What I would like is a program that copies the files to folders created based on the dates the files were taken, which is what our Ricoh digicam does. If I've got multiple days I manually copy the folders to where I want them and rename since the Pentax naming system is unsortable! If anyone has a program that does this in one step, please enlighten me!

Cheers, Nige
HGMonaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 09:51 PM   #8
Site Supporter
 
Canada_Rockies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sparwood, BC, Canada
Gallery Photos: 16
Posts: 1,912
Originally Posted by HGMonaro View Post
I usually use the USB cable because I leave it connected to the computer and just plug the camera in. Taking the card out involves more effort and time as I have to open a door on the PC to insert it. Transfer speed wise doesn't really concern me as I usually walk away and do something else if there are heaps of files to transfer.

If I have only one days shooting on the card (which is usually the case) I use a little program called 'transferrer' that copies the files to a new folder created for todays date under a folder I've specified (eg 2008). What I would like is a program that copies the files to folders created based on the dates the files were taken, which is what our Ricoh digicam does. If I've got multiple days I manually copy the folders to where I want them and rename since the Pentax naming system is unsortable! If anyone has a program that does this in one step, please enlighten me!

Cheers, Nige
You have such a program already - it's in your camera. In the menus, find the option where the camera will create a separate folder on the card by date. It will start at 100-xxxx and the next day will be 101-xxxx and so forth. That's how I set up my K10D.
__________________
Albert in the Rockies - Items in bold are in the pic in my profile
SF-1, MZ-S, AF500FTZ
M 100/4 Macro, M 400/5.6, FA 28-80, FA 24-90, A 70-210, A 1.4X-S
K10D, D-BG2 grip, DA 12-24, DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135
Manfrotto 055B tripod with 0168 ball head, Benbo Trekker tripod, Velbon UP-43 Monopod
My Flickr Photos - Pentax tests: http://www.flickr.com/photos/albert_berry/
Canada_Rockies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 11:03 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Melb. Aust
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 206
got that invoked already, however it ain't a proper date (it's the year 2008 here!) and has to be renamed (so it's half the solution). Who thought of that scheme (using "1nn" for a suffix)... What does it achieve? Why not use the real date?
HGMonaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 06:50 AM   #10
Loyal Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Owego, NY
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 566
Originally Posted by HGMonaro View Post
got that invoked already, however it ain't a proper date (it's the year 2008 here!) and has to be renamed (so it's half the solution). Who thought of that scheme (using "1nn" for a suffix)... What does it achieve? Why not use the real date?
I believe K20 does, I have that function disabled.

You could probably write something to do the autorenaming/moving in Perl quite easily.
Entropy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:36 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.