Epson 2200 with OEM pigments and, for B&W, the QTR driver. Favorite papers for B&W are Moab Entrada and Museo Portfolio Rag (can't get HPR anymore in small sheets). For color I usually use Moab Lasal Matte, which is super-white, remarkably high definition, and has proven more stable than the old Epson Enhanced Matte...
If I suspect it's good I always print 8.5X11, if only as a proof. I really like it, 11X17 or, occasionally, 13X19 (2200's maximum sheet size).
Currently, 8.5x11" since I have a few packs of the Epson premium photo paper in that size. The problem is finding matts that are cut to that size.
When multifunction/photo printers (hopefully Epson) that print 11x17 become more common (currently only Brother has one), I'll probably get one of those. I'd like the opportunity to print a little larger on occasion. I know I could send it out, but I prefer to do it myself.
When (and if) you frequently print out your Pentax photographs, what kind of size and brand of paper do you most frequently use?
Ah, this itouches on one of my ongoing issues, fitting a 3:2 ratio image into an industry standard 4:5 mat/frame world.
So, first of all, the survey is fine but A3 paper isn't 12x16", it's 11.7x16.5" (see Paper size - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ) so if you do borderless printing it will clip. If you leave a margin/border/self-mat around the image you'll have to print smaller than the paper size.
A full 3:2 Pentax image from a 6mp sensor has to be scaled up to fit and the closest full 3:2 image size with the smallest margin on A3 paper will be 130% for a 10.x16.3"... for a 10mp or 14mp image it will have to be scaled down to fit.
But... since most frames/mats commonly available are in the 4:5 ratio, to fit "standard" frame/mat combinations you will need to either output the image on the paper for the best size possible as a bordered (self-matted image), or, crop to a standard frame/mat combination (an 11 x 14 mat = an 8 x10" image opening) and that means cropping out about 25% of the image .
Unless I''m doing something wrong,
FHPhotographer
__________________ It's not the tool
...it's the toolmaker
Last edited by FHPhotographer; 10-01-2008 at 02:12 PM..
Reason: oops, wrong ratio