PentaxForums.com  

Go Back   PentaxForums.com > Pentax Photography > General Pentax Photography

General Pentax Photography Discuss the fundamentals of photography, Pentax camera modes, infrared and macro shooting, and related topics here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-11-2008, 07:08 PM   #1
Loyal Member
 
raider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Gallery Photos: 8
Posts: 431
how to meter correctly an object with their back facing direct sunlight?

If an object has its back facing the sun, how do we meter the exposure correctly?

If I point the camera at the sun and use the exposure lock button, then recompose and shoot, I get a picture whose main subject is totally dark.

If I point the camera the the object and then use the exposure lock button, then the subject is at least recognizable but the background is now heavily overexposed.

How am i suppose to do this right?

Thanks!
raider
__________________
Raider
"Never create what you can't control"

K100D, DA18-55mm, DA50-200mm, FA50mm, DA14mm, T28-75mm, FA80-320, Raynox 250
http://www.flickr.com/photos/josephlo71photo
raider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 08:01 PM   #2
Site Supporter
 
dantuyhoa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Gallery Photos: 10
Posts: 1,001
It's entirely up to you for the effect that you want . Though you can take spot readings at the brightest part and the darkest , use the middle reading . Or take a reading at the green grass, stone surface then increase it by one stop . Bracket the shot . There is really no "correct" exposure .
dantuyhoa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 08:05 PM   #3
Ole
Site Supporter
 
Ole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
Gallery Photos: 62
Posts: 1,085
You could consider to use fill flash so as to get the subject and the background exposed correctly. In P mode: Simply raise the flash and shoot.
Ole is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 08:13 PM   #4
Site Supporter
 
dantuyhoa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Gallery Photos: 10
Posts: 1,001
Ole is correct

Or you could use a reflector .
dantuyhoa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 08:34 PM   #5
Loyal Member
 
Marc Sabatella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Gallery Photos: 10
Posts: 812
Originally Posted by raider View Post
If I point the camera the the object and then use the exposure lock button, then the subject is at least recognizable but the background is now heavily overexposed.
That's the best you can do in these high contrast situations if you want a recognizable subject without PP. Maybe dial in a little of negative exposure compensation to try to get *some* detail into the background, but of course, that makes your subject darker.

I shoot using center weighted metering in M mode. I will generally point both at the ground in front of the subject and at the sky, and set the exposure so the ground reads a little negative and the sky a little positive. Of course, in many situations, one of these is going to have to be *lot* positive or negative, so I just make a judgement call - am I OK with a more overexposed background, or do I wsnt to preserve it and then need to do more PP to get my subject out of the deep shadow (and live with the noise tht will probably result).
Marc Sabatella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 09:06 PM   #6
Loyal Member
 
raider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Gallery Photos: 8
Posts: 431
Thanks for all the help.

I wonder if K20D's high dynamic range feature will help in this kind of situations?
__________________
Raider
"Never create what you can't control"

K100D, DA18-55mm, DA50-200mm, FA50mm, DA14mm, T28-75mm, FA80-320, Raynox 250
http://www.flickr.com/photos/josephlo71photo
raider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 10:12 PM   #7
Site Supporter
 
Damn Brit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oakland, CA
Gallery Photos: 70
Posts: 4,327
Originally Posted by raider View Post
Thanks for all the help.

I wonder if K20D's high dynamic range feature will help in this kind of situations?
It shouldn't make any difference, there really are only two options for this situation, meter for the light source and have your subject as a silhouette or use fill flash either from the front or side or both.
__________________
Gary is my name.
Canadian by adoption eh.


My forum gallery pics here: http://www.pentaxforums.com/gallery/...lbum-5983.html
Damn Brit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 12:51 AM   #8
Loyal Member
 
Marc Sabatella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Gallery Photos: 10
Posts: 812
Originally Posted by raider View Post
I wonder if K20D's high dynamic range feature will help in this kind of situations?
It might, but it's only good for a stop, and the dynamic range of scenes such as you describe are more problematic than that. In any case, the D-range feature really doesn't do anything you couldn't do just as well in PP.
Marc Sabatella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 05:37 AM   #9
Loyal Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ste-Anne des Plaines, Qc., Canada
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 731
The D-Range of the K20D makes a VERY LIGHT difference, but nothing to write home about. Your best bet is still to use fill flash. Or, if your subject can stand very still for a few seconds, you can bracket your exposures and go with an HDR image.
flyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 07:22 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 224
Absolutely use a fill-flash, both the subject and sky will be correctly exposed.
__________________

"Amateurs worry about equipment, pros worry about money, masters worry about light."
NicholasN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 10:09 PM   #11
Site Supporter
 
Canada_Rockies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sparwood, BC, Canada
Gallery Photos: 25
Posts: 2,073
Another alternative is to take a bracketed set and use HDR software to put them together. My opinion is that the reflector is the best solution (you can see the effect before taking the shot) followed by the fill flash.

If you are not equipped for either of these options, make sure you take a RAW image. Make two copies. Develop one for the subject, the other for the background, and assemble them in your post processing software.

I have heard, but never tried, that this can be done on one frame in the camera using the multiple exposure option.
__________________
Albert in the Rockies http://www.flickr.com/photos/albert_berry/
SF-1, MZ-S, K10D + D-BG2 grip
M 100/4 Macro, M 400/5.6, A 70-210/4, FA 28-80, FA 24-90, DA 12-24/4, DA* 16-50/2.8, DA* 50-135/2.8, A 1.4X-S TC, AF 1.7X TC
Manfrotto 055B tripod + 0168 ball head, Benbo Trekker tripod, Velbon UP-43 Monopod
Canada_Rockies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2008, 09:27 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bay Village, Ohio USA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 130
Reflector

Originally Posted by dantuyhoa View Post
Ole is correct

Or you could use a reflector .
And you don't need an expensive photographic reflector. In a pinch, a simple piece of white posterboard or even a white pillowcase can be used as a reasonably effective reflector.

Just have an assistant stand next to you holding the posterboard, aimed so that the sunlight is bounced back to the subject.

You can even get a little bit creative and have the reflector positioned to one side, so that you get some interesting shadows/highlights on the subjects' faces.

Think outside the box a little. I have one photography book, in which the author describes a wedding shoot in a large, high-ceiling church. Since on camera flash can be rather harsh, and there was no chance of bouncing the flash off of a wall or ceiling, he grabbed one of the groomsmen who was wearing a white tuxedo shirt, had him open his jacket and bounced the flash off the shirt onto the bride. My point is that almost any large, light colored surface can function as a reflector.

Paul Noble
__________________
Paul Noble
noblepa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2008, 11:25 PM   #13
Site Supporter
 
Venturi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tulsa, OK
Gallery Photos: 4
Posts: 815
Originally Posted by Canada_Rockies View Post
I have heard, but never tried, that this can be done on one frame in the camera using the multiple exposure option.
You can with both the K10D & K20D, although with a simple firmware modification it could be a lot easier especially with the K20D and its single-squeeze bracketing.
Just put the camera into multi-exposure mode and check the "Auto EV Adjust" box. Then take your shots, adjusting your shutter/aperture/ISO between shots as you desire for your effect. The camera stacks the exposures into one image and does the math behind the scenes to EV compensate.
It works fairly well, but it isn't true HDR as there is no tone-mapping going on. What I wish they had done was allow multi-exposure and auto-bracket to be used together rather than exclusive to each other. If you turn on multi-exp first it cancels bracketing; turn on bracketing first and multi-exp is cancelled.
__________________
- Jim
Resident Pain in the Aperture


My Gear
Venturi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 06:31 AM   #14
Pentaxian
 
MRRiley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sterling, Virginia, USA
Gallery Photos: 26
Posts: 1,192
There is a reason many experienced outdoor portrait photographers wear white shirts. IF you do have a backlit situation, your shirt can act as a simple fill reflector.

By the same token, don't wear funky colors when shooting, as they can introduce a color cast to your subject if you are close enough for it to reflect fill light.

ohhh... and if you need a cheap fill reflector buy one of those auto windscreen protectors with silver/grey on one side and black on the other.
__________________
Michael R. Riley (Mike) / Carpe Luminous Photography - Sterling, VA
Michael Riley at Photo.Net and at the Pentax Photo Gallery.

PENTAX K10D, K110D, DA16-45mm, DA18-55mm & DA50-200mm, a Tamron 28-75mm f2.8, a Sigma 50-500 "BIGMA", & a handful of vintage Pentax and other lenses...
MRRiley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 07:47 AM   #15
Loyal Member
 
raider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Gallery Photos: 8
Posts: 431
Thanks for all the suggestions. I will these tips next time i go shooting.
__________________
Raider
"Never create what you can't control"

K100D, DA18-55mm, DA50-200mm, FA50mm, DA14mm, T28-75mm, FA80-320, Raynox 250
http://www.flickr.com/photos/josephlo71photo
raider is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:48 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.