On the topic of the DSG. That transmission is amazing. My moms new 09 Jetta SportWagen TDI has it and its absolutely phenomenal. It's 8ms shifts are faster than F1.
And the TDI engine itself is awesome. We get about 40mpg normally, but on the highway, 50 is no problem. And even being economicaly, its still tons of fun to drive as compared to a hybrid. It pulls sooo very hard. Tons of torque. Even in the TDI Cup racing series, going all out for however many laps, they get about 25mpg. We need more diesel's in the US. Europe has had them as a large part of their fleet for a long while.
My sister-in-law was down this week from up north. She was amazed at how much more expensive things are down here (food, clothing, etc.) than just outside NYC
Then maybe you should move to NY where you would have more $$$.
Then maybe you should move to NY where you would have more $$$.
Yeah. I could do that. My salary would be about 4x what I make in Florida. But then I have to put up with New Yorkers and snow. My point was most people think Florida is a cheap place to live. It ain't so. At one point in the housing boom hayday it was one of the most expensive.
Even McCain was spouting about the "Global Warming" garbage. And that ticked me off about him. But he was still the lesser of 2 evils. We need real conservatives not the RINOs.
That's the thing, though. Neither was the lesser of 2 evils, just two different heads of the same evil. Two big parties make it look like the public has some control, and then whoever gets put in office just continues carrying out the agendas of our nation's big financial institutions. I mean, look at what Obama promised as opposed to what he's actually done. It seems as if many of Obama's actual actions are more like what us Obama-voters expected would have happened if McCain had been elected... I count myself as disillusioned from the "liberal" camp (never had much stock in it anyways) but that certainly doesn't line me up as a disciple of the current "conservative" group.
That's the thing, though. Neither was the lesser of 2 evils, just two different heads of the same evil. Two big parties make it look like the public has some control, and then whoever gets put in office just continues carrying out the agendas of our nation's big financial institutions. I mean, look at what Obama promised as opposed to what he's actually done. It seems as if many of Obama's actual actions are more like what us Obama-voters expected would have happened if McCain had been elected... I count myself as disillusioned from the "liberal" camp (never had much stock in it anyways) but that certainly doesn't line me up as a disciple of the current "conservative" group.
The lesser of two evils just depended on which side of the fence you were on. Whether you went 1 inch left or right. I am no longer a Republican. My party left me. I am a conservative. Always have been always will be. And if the Repubics ever get their fannies in gear I will call myself a Republican again. But not till they get back on track.
(Why do I get the feeling I am going to have to explain this remark)
Cause you had some need for explanation in mind when you typed it?
Pardon the typoes from not being sititng down when I typed that retort.
But, really. You think some inability of yours to be a rugged individualist really has something to do with 'liberals' stopping you?
Try us.
You might be disappointed what you *get,* but it seems to be something you wrap *your* life around. 'If Only Liberals Weren't trying To Take My Stuff, Everything Would be Great.'
'To each according to need, from each according to ability.'
Scary Commies.
Unless of course that's how a family works.
You're a free citizen, Graphic. And so is everyone else.
If keeping your idea of wealth is what matters to you then that's what you'll receive.
Merry part. Again, don't act like anyone's stopping you. Or was Ayn Rand not so 'right' as you say?
Also, I knew the 'Who's on First' sketch by heart with some friends in sixth grade. Did you really find some way to make it offensive in your own mind?
From each according to his ability, to each according to his need (or needs) is a slogan popularized by Karl Marx in his 1875 Critique of the Gotha Program.[1] The phrase summarizes the principles that, under a communist system, every person should contribute to society to the best of his ability and consume from society in proportion to his needs, regardless of how much he has contributed. In the Marxist view, such an arrangement will be made possible by the abundance of goods and services that a developed communist society will produce; the idea is that there will be enough to satisfy everyone's needs.[2][3]
from Wikipedia
What is the "chip" on your shoulder? What is it that makes you want to antagonize? Where you not loved as a child? Do you feel unfulfilled because you have no child of your own? Do yo have unresolved issues with your Father?
If so, there is help. It is just a prayer away.
I am leaving the building. I am going to get my lovely wife and I am going to take her out for dinner at a fancy restaurant. I will be served hand and foot and will eat good food. I will sip libations and smoke an expensive imported cigar. I will then go home and make love to the hottest woman on the planet. She's all mine and none of you could ever have her.
Well we might go to dinner anyway. Just not fast food. God how could they use those two words in the same sentence?
Last edited by graphicgr8s; 07-17-2009 at 03:21 PM.