Originally Posted by B Grace
Nah, I'd pick Lou Gehrig for best all-around Yankee. Now if you're talking best player in baseball ever, well, that would be Satchel Paige.
Gehrig, great as he was, didn't impact the game nealry as much as the Babe.
There's a reason why Yankee Stadium is (was) "The House That Ruth Built".
IN 1920, Ruth hit 54 hr's and had an .847 slugging percentage. That slugging percentage was an MLB record for 81 years, until a chemically enhanced Barry Bonds beat it.
Oh, and the 54 hr's? More than every other
team except the Phillies. A current player would need to hit over 200 hr's.
-- here's a follow-up to that stat:
■In 1927, Babe Ruth's 60 home runs accounted for 14% of all home runs in the American League that year. To put that figure in modern perspective, a player would need to hit over 340 home runs in a season to account for 14% of the American League's total homerun output.
In Bill Jenkinson's 2006 book,
The Year Babe Ruth Hit 104 Home Runs, the author examined accounts of all of Ruth's hits, and concluded that he may have hit as many as 104 dingers. Rules were different back then, such as placement of the foul poles, and also if the ball hit the foul pole it was ruled a double - not a homer as it is now.
In a time when media was much slower and less pervasive, Ruth was a bigger phenomenon than any current player. Probably only Jordan and Ali could compare on a worldwide scale.
After the Red Sox sold Ruth to the Yankees, he outhomered the entire Boston team in 10 of the next 12 seasons.
Babe began his career in the dead ball era, yet hit gobs of homers.
94-46 2.28 ERA as a pitcher.
He's still #1 in sluggin % & OPS, and #2 in OBP (2nd to Bar-roid Bonds).
All in all, his level of statistical domination is unmatched.