Micro APS-C camera from SONY

ogl · 10-25-2009, 11:03 AM

ewalk · 10-25-2009, 12:03 PM

I'm pretty sure that's a fake.

There were several typos and odd images/words in the .pdf I saw.

ogl · 10-25-2009, 11:10 PM

PMA will answer. It could be not-ready layout of pdf of future camera.

janneman · 10-26-2009, 04:36 AM

Originally Posted by ogl

PMA will answer. It could be not-ready layout of pdf of future camera.

oh yes, I remember, isn't there a rumor that the 645D will come soon?

Jasvox · 10-26-2009, 07:26 AM

Originally Posted by ogl

ËûÃÇÀ´ÁË£¡SONYÍÆ³öM-APS£¡£¡ - Micro4/3ÏµÍ³ÌÖÂÛ - 4/3ÉãÓ°ÂÛÌ³ |4/3ÏµÍ³|O¼ÇÒ»×å|Èý·ÖÖ®ËÄ|°ÂÁÖ°ÍË¹|olympus|EÏµÍ³|4/3ÏµÍ³|ËÉÏÂ|áâ¿¨|ÊÊÂí|¿Â´ï|M43|Î¢43 - Powered by Discuz!

Samsung!!! Pentax!!! Where are you???

Maybe they are too busy working on that FF body you have been whining about for the past couple of years.

Jason

ogl · 10-26-2009, 08:16 AM

Ricoh will help

lithos · 10-30-2009, 03:19 AM

Originally Posted by ewalk

I'm pretty sure that's a fake.

There were several typos and odd images/words in the .pdf I saw.

Aye. "Focal lenght"?

I'm also wondering why a camera that relies on an EVF would also need a mechanical (sorry, "mecanical") shutter.

It's good to see it's "Digital" is "Interchangeable." With analogue, perhaps?