It's a pretty good selection of fine images when you don't even vote for your own image, and I did not. I think it is contrary to the spirit to say which you like best here - so I won't list my votes, nor tell you which is mine.
I second that motion.
__________________
This is my sigfile and not part of the thread:
An avid supporter of Italian football/soccer/calcio (Forza Azzurri and Juventus)
If you have bird images you might want to upload go to www.birdsite.org. NO ADVERTISING
Identify insect at http://bugguide.net/node/view/15740
I read a lot of griping about the subject but, DAMN! there's some really great images up there. There's two that I'd like to know who took them. That's all I'm saying for now.. Very nice entries all!!
"They are great works, #4 to me is too much and didn't look real. I'm in to the true looking photo. Play with in too much on a computor and you take away the life of the photo."
I'll be behind you waiting for that same shot!!
That is a tough one. For visual impact I really was really wowed by #4. I knew it was not a straight shot, but then again, back in the old days we did an awful lot in the darkroom to "adjust" the print (and negative too) to what was seen in the mind's eye as the exposure was being made. I can remember using the heat from my finger tips to enhance the development of different regions of a print by touching the paper in the bath. The only straight prints were the ones you got from the drug store.
Having said that, when you drill into the exif data to expose the photoshop history and see just how much labor went into the rendition of the #4, you have to admit that the results are pretty heavily manipulated.