Wow, now I'm REALLY glad I didn't get a shot that I felt was good enough to enter!
Originally Posted by little laker
Even with cable it took a fair amount of time to download, and I hate to wonder how long it takes the people with dial-up to get them all. And a thumb should give us a good idea if we'll like the picture.
I agree -- I'm on cable and it's early in the morning, EDT, and I still can't get them all to load at once. #41 is missing.
Originally Posted by Mo
If we want thumbnails in here we'll have to require all submissions to include thumbnails as well. It would definitely help tidy up the voting page, but it doesn't seem realistic

Actually, at this point, wouldn't reducing the number of entries help?

Plus, there are free sites like flickr where the thumbnails are generated for you, so we don't have to worry about it being cost-prohibitive or software-dependent. And it's a month-long contest, so "I didn't have time" is a less persuasive argument...
The other option (although this is slightly more complicated logistically for Adam) would be one "voting" thread (no pictures) but multiple "viewing" threads, say of 10-20 images each.
How about that?