Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
01-31-2007, 06:11 PM   #1
Inactive Account




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lone Tree, Colorado, USA
Posts: 77
Pentax Magnifying Eyecup 0-ME53

I received my magnifying eyepiece today from B&H for $40 incl S&H.

The brochure says that it magnifies 1.18X and weighs a whopping 0.4 ounce.

Question- Does a magnifier device reduce the brightness of the image as seen the viewfinder? I have read elsewhere the usual yes/no and point/counterpoint. This more an academic question than anything......I'm satisfied with the item.

To me it appears not, but maybe the brightness loss is there, but negligible. I can't tell (as of yet).

The larger image thru the viewfinder is certainly a quite nice enhancement to the camera, and I'm glad that I made the purchase.

Thanks to all......

Lucky Sky

01-31-2007, 07:21 PM   #2
Veteran Member
Scott Rylance's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia/Geelong, Vic
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 420
Hi,
I'm sorry I can't answer your question, except I have the Nikkon one I used on my K100 with No reduction of brightness.
I have a request if possible....could you post a pic of the camera with the eyepiece on it.
Cheers.
01-31-2007, 07:51 PM   #3
Inactive Account




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lone Tree, Colorado, USA
Posts: 77
Original Poster
Scott-

I certainly will post a pic tomorrow as requested........I'll fire up my little Canon A610.

I had better ask right now.......how do I embed an image into a message on this forum?

Lucky Sky
01-31-2007, 07:54 PM   #4
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: carpentersville, IL
Posts: 693
QuoteOriginally posted by Scott Rylance Quote
Hi,
I'm sorry I can't answer your question, except I have the Nikkon one I used on my K100 with No reduction of brightness.
I have a request if possible....could you post a pic of the camera with the eyepiece on it.
Cheers.
woah, and which one are you using? I'm trying to get one but I'm not sure if 1.18x magnification is enough of a difference...

01-31-2007, 09:56 PM   #5
Veteran Member
Scott Rylance's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia/Geelong, Vic
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 420
Hi Lucky, thanks.
Here's how you can post a pic here.
"Put [IMG] before the link to the pic on a web site and [/IMG] after the link.
Example "[img]www.photosareus.net/mine/me.jpg[img]"
Don't include the inverted comers.

Cheers.
01-31-2007, 10:01 PM   #6
Veteran Member
Scott Rylance's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia/Geelong, Vic
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 420
Hi Dave,
I bought the Nikon DK-21M off ebay. It's 1.17x and fits pretty tight but works fine, especially for manual focusing.
Cheers.
02-01-2007, 06:44 AM   #7
Inactive Account




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lone Tree, Colorado, USA
Posts: 77
Original Poster
Scott- A couple of pics:




Lucky Sky

02-01-2007, 06:53 AM   #8
Inactive Account




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Posts: 810
QuoteOriginally posted by Lucky Sky Quote
This more an academic question than anything......I'm satisfied with the item.
To me it appears not, but maybe the brightness loss is there, but negligible. I can't tell (as of yet).
Academic questions get academic answers: Yes, it reduces the brightness. Thinking about it is is hard to imagine anything (a "picture" built by rays of light) getting bigger without getting dimmer. With this level of magnification you'll probably not noticing unless you check for it very hard.

I have two other questions: Is it easy to see all info around the viewfinder? Is the glass (plastic?) coated? I'm asking as the Nikon counterpart I'm using now for my DS isn't coated and sometimes that makes a difference.

thank you,

Last edited by Jonas B; 02-01-2007 at 06:54 AM. Reason: forgot the nikon thing
02-01-2007, 09:23 AM   #9
Inactive Account




Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 139
Are you using eyeglasses when you shoot or naked eye? I read somewhere that the magnifier is not useful if you wear glasses.

Walt
02-01-2007, 09:49 AM   #10
Inactive Account




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lone Tree, Colorado, USA
Posts: 77
Original Poster
Jonas & Walt-
1) I cannot see any difference in brightness as you stated.
2) There is some slight vignetting around the corners as the brochure warns about. The viewfinder information area is not affected.
3) Unable to determine if the piece is glass or coated, but this may help: when I look at it under my tungsten desk light, the reflection of the lightbulb has a very distinct green color to it.
4) I don't wear glasses except for reading. With my reading glasses on (magnifying lenses), the vignetting effect is much more pronounced.

Lucky Sky
02-01-2007, 03:41 PM   #11
Veteran Member
Scott Rylance's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia/Geelong, Vic
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 420
Thank for the pics Lucky. It looks nicer than my Nikon one.
Cheers.
02-01-2007, 04:39 PM   #12
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: carpentersville, IL
Posts: 693
QuoteOriginally posted by Scott Rylance Quote
Hi Dave,
I bought the Nikon DK-21M off ebay. It's 1.17x and fits pretty tight but works fine, especially for manual focusing.
Cheers.
well sir, I just ordered the nikon piece........
02-02-2007, 02:38 PM   #13
Senior Member




Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 230
I see a big upside to that - not smearing the LCD preview screen

I was out shooting yesterday and the angle of the sun was killing me. I was shifting around mashing my face against the camera to avoid a stray ray squeezing in between me and the camera, holding one hand up and cursing. Then checking the preview screen after to see if what I thought I was getting was what it was, but each time having to stop and clean the screen. Seems worth it if it helps avoid that grief again.
02-02-2007, 03:30 PM   #14
Inactive Account




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Posts: 810
QuoteOriginally posted by Jonas B Quote

I have two other questions: Is it easy to see all info around the viewfinder? Is the glass (plastic?) coated? I'm asking as the Nikon counterpart I'm using now for my DS isn't coated and sometimes that makes a difference.

thank you,
Bumping my own questions...
02-02-2007, 06:30 PM   #15
Inactive Account




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lone Tree, Colorado, USA
Posts: 77
Original Poster
Jonas B-

This was my reply yesterday to you & Walt-

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Jonas & Walt-
1) I cannot see any difference in brightness as you stated.
2) There is some slight vignetting around the corners as the brochure warns about. The viewfinder information area is not affected.
3) Unable to determine if the piece is glass or coated, but this may help: when I look at it under my tungsten desk light, the reflection of the lightbulb has a very distinct green color to it.
4) I don't wear glasses except for reading. With my reading glasses on (magnifying lenses), the vignetting effect is much more pronounced
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
brightness, image, pentax magnifying eyecup, question, tripod, viewfinder

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Pentax Accessories: Remote Control F, Magnifying Eyecup O-ME53, Genuine Pen ( porterHause Sold Items 6 12-07-2010 08:06 PM
For Sale - Sold: Pentax O-ME53 Magnifying Eyecup ChipB Sold Items 2 02-04-2009 03:12 PM
For Sale - Sold: FS: Pentax Magnifying Eyecup O-ME53 frank Sold Items 7 04-06-2008 01:03 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:49 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top