PentaxForums.com

Go Back PentaxForums.com > Pentax Cameras > Pentax DSLR Discussion > K7 vs d3. Comparison!!!

Pentax DSLR Discussion Talk about Pentax Digital SLR modes, technique, operation, and problems here (K and *ist D series).

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
05-26-2009, 05:22 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Location: U.S. /Miami - Florida.
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 204
K7 vs d3. Comparison!!!

YouTube - PENTAX K-7(5.2 fps) vs Nikon D3(at?5.0 fps) shooting with LENZ
vitalsax is offline  
05-26-2009, 05:25 AM   #2
Ash
Site Supporter
 
Location: Toowoomba, Australia
Gallery Photos: 100
Posts: 7,919
Yep, we've seen this one.
Discussion's centred around how the K-7's rate is slower than 5.2fps and the D3 is clearly faster (by this video).
Although the K-7's shutter sound is much better dampened and slick.
Ash is online now  
05-26-2009, 05:29 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Location: U.S. /Miami - Florida.
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 204
Originally Posted by Ash View Post
Yep, we've seen this one.
Discussion's centred around how the K-7's rate is slower than 5.2fps and the D3 is clearly faster (by this video).
Although the K-7's shutter sound is much better dampened and slick.
oh sorry! i didn't, but it sounds really quiet indeed.
vitalsax is offline  
05-26-2009, 09:00 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Location: Berlin, Germany
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 29
I measured the rate of the cameras in this video (not with a stopwatch but by opening the video in a sound editing app)

the Nikon has a rate of 4.97 fps, while the Pentax has a rate of 4.22 fps in the first run and 4.00 fps in the last run.

I know the Pentax is supposed to make more than 5 fps, but isn't the Nikon supposed to make 9 fps??

The question is if the lower rate of the Pentax is due to the unfinished firmware, or maybe the memory card isn't fast enough...?
Alcazar is offline  
05-26-2009, 09:05 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Location: Sweden
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 28
Originally Posted by Alcazar View Post
I measured the rate of the cameras in this video (not with a stopwatch but by opening the video in a sound editing app)

the Nikon has a rate of 4.97 fps, while the Pentax has a rate of 4.22 fps in the first run and 4.00 fps in the last run.

I know the Pentax is supposed to make more than 5 fps, but isn't the Nikon supposed to make 9 fps??

The question is if the lower rate of the Pentax is due to the unfinished firmware, or maybe the memory card isn't fast enough...?
... or the shutter speed is too low.
joakimfors is offline  
05-26-2009, 09:42 AM   #6
Pentaxian
 
Gallery Photos: 4
Posts: 512
when they say "5ps or 9fps" what is the "minimum" shutter speed to get these figures? 1/125?
leadbelly is offline  
05-26-2009, 11:28 AM   #7
Loyal Member
 
Location: Australia
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 378
speed is not important to me at all

and the k20d already has better image quality.
WerTicus is offline  
05-26-2009, 03:17 PM   #8
Loyal Member
 
Location: Oklahoma
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 863
Originally Posted by joakimfors View Post
... or the shutter speed is too low.
Excellent point. It was indoors. That also might explain why the D3 was much slower than its maximum as well, if both cameras were limited by the slow shutter speed.
PentaxPoke is offline  
05-26-2009, 03:28 PM   #9
Pentaxian
 
Location: Stockport, Manchester. UK
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 355
don't care, the K-7 is better than my K20D, so if I had the money, I would have the K-7 for most work as it is excellent, and maybe a D3 for fast fps when I need it.
But I don't have the money so I will stick with my K20D and save up for the K-7........

(does the jealousy come through? hmmmmm, Okay I would love both....... ;-) )
offertonhatter is offline  
05-26-2009, 06:53 PM   #10
Pentaxian
 
Location: Canada
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 284
looks like the K7's battery charged is low, you can see it slowing down.

cheers,

Rene
OPTMEKX& is offline  
05-27-2009, 04:40 AM   #11
Site Supporter
 
Location: Fredonia, NY
Gallery Photos: 6
Posts: 761
They really should have used a full battery with each, and set them in manual to shoot small jpegs at 1/1000 with the lens wide open. That would effectively eliminate all the variables besides the speed of each camera's shutter mechanism and show what each can really do (in which case the D3 will trounce the K-7 at 9fps but who expected it to out-burst Nikon's $5000 fastest?).
er1kksen is offline  
05-27-2009, 12:39 PM   #12
Pentaxian
 
Location: Belgium
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 327
Originally Posted by leadbelly View Post
when they say "5ps or 9fps" what is the "minimum" shutter speed to get these figures? 1/125?
Theoretically at X-sync (1/180s for the K-7; 1/250s for the D3...)
Pentaxke is offline  
05-27-2009, 09:46 PM   #13
Pentaxian
 
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,588
I don't see how they can compare the D3 to the K-7. They are entirely different categories.
jct us101 is offline  
05-27-2009, 10:11 PM   #14
Ash
Site Supporter
 
Location: Toowoomba, Australia
Gallery Photos: 100
Posts: 7,919
Originally Posted by OPTMEKX& View Post
looks like the K7's battery charged is low, you can see it slowing down.

cheers,

Rene
I'm not sure battery charge levels have anything to do with frame speed, or any other function. If there's not enough power to perform the function, it just won't function.
Ash is online now  
05-28-2009, 03:25 AM   #15
Loyal Member
 
Location: Umeå, Sweden
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 457
Originally Posted by Ash View Post
I'm not sure battery charge levels have anything to do with frame speed, or any other function. If there's not enough power to perform the function, it just won't function.
Anyone who has tried different types of AA batteries in a K1xxD/*istDx knows this is very far from true.
Erik is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:08 PM.