PentaxForums.com  

Go Back   PentaxForums.com > Pentax Photography > Pentax Film SLR Discussion

Pentax Film SLR Discussion Talk about modern and classic Pentax film SLR's in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-22-2008, 12:07 PM   #1
Pentaxian
 
Gooshin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toronto, the one in Canada.
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 2,584
cost of film developing

using todays costs of chemicals, and the initial cost of the equipment necessary

is it advantageous to process film ones self or just forget about it and give it to a 3rd party?
__________________
„¸¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨ „ø¤º°¨
¨°º¤ø„ OBAMA „ø¤º°¨
¸„ø¤º°¨2008 ``°º¤ø„¸
ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¨°º¤ø
Gooshin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 12:10 PM   #2
Site Supporter
 
séamuis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: here & now
Gallery Photos: 6
Posts: 1,405
I don't know about colour, but I'm pretty sure processing B&W yourself is still cheaper.
__________________
'If it isn't an Eastman, it isn't a Kodak'
Asahi Pentax MX | smc-M 28mm 2,0 | smc-M 35mm 2,8 | smc-M 50mm 1,7 | smc-M 85mm 2,0 | Ilford & Kodak
aperturefoundation | Street Photography & Winogrand | J.E.Moore Photography
'Đời cha ăn mặn, đời con khát nước.'
séamuis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 12:19 PM   #3
WJW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Texas
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 177
Originally Posted by Gooshin View Post
using todays costs of chemicals, and the initial cost of the equipment necessary

is it advantageous to process film ones self or just forget about it and give it to a 3rd party?
Color or B&W?

Locally, I can get color processed for about what it would cost me to do it so I have it done.

B&W is a different story. No local lab handles it so it is all sent out, you have no choice of developer ( they usually use something like D-76 or a commercial concentrate), and ANY requested modifications to processing cost a fortune. So I process all of my B&W.

The cost of the equipment for basic B&W is minimal if you buy used and there are tons of it available on ebay. Chemistry cost is a bit trickier. The basic stuff is not expensive and cost per roll can be good IF you process eenough that the stuff doesn't sit around and go bad.

Jeff
WJW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 12:25 PM   #4
Pentaxian
 
Gooshin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toronto, the one in Canada.
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 2,584
this will be primarily for B&W at the moment.

i dont mind doing bulk so as to not waste chemicals

my only concern though is ISO selection, do i have to use different chemicals for different ISO's?

is there a crash course on developing out on the net that someone could recomend.

i have processed film before... but i was 9 years old, hehehe.
__________________
„¸¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨ „ø¤º°¨
¨°º¤ø„ OBAMA „ø¤º°¨
¸„ø¤º°¨2008 ``°º¤ø„¸
ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¨°º¤ø
Gooshin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 12:27 PM   #5
Site Supporter
 
Nesster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ USA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,234
Let's assume an initial setup cost of $80 for the equipment and chemicals.

Last time I dropped off a roll of 120 B&W at the local store (for local 'develop only') it was something like $3.99 - I was pleasantly surprised. So call it $4 for a roll of film, developed only, by someone in town.

80/4 = 20 rolls break even. I'm not counting the time I'd spend cursing at the damn film not going into the damn reel...

After that, it's just the chemicals cost, and the equation starts to favor home developing.

Or that's the story I tell myself anyway...
Nesster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 12:42 PM   #6
Pentaxian
 
Gooshin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toronto, the one in Canada.
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 2,584
just thinking ahead, would i need a different tank/reel for 120 film than for 35mm? (the LBA/CBA has bit me so hard, i'm currently in the market for a MF camera... ahhhhhhh)
__________________
„¸¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨ „ø¤º°¨
¨°º¤ø„ OBAMA „ø¤º°¨
¸„ø¤º°¨2008 ``°º¤ø„¸
ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¨°º¤ø
Gooshin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 12:51 PM   #7
Site Supporter
 
Nesster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ USA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,234
The reel I will get if I get one, the Jobo, is a size that takes 2 35mm reels or 1 120. And the reel adjusts & has big ears to guide the film. When I last developed something 25 years ago I used Paterson tanks and reels... no way could you get me to do the (s)he-man metal contraptions.
Nesster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 02:39 PM   #8
WJW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Texas
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 177
Originally Posted by Gooshin View Post
my only concern though is ISO selection, do i have to use different chemicals for different ISO's?

is there a crash course on developing out on the net that someone could recomend.
You might find that you prefer different developers for different films. I worked out my system to two different films that I develop in Rodinal. Once I was satisfied with my results, I bought 100 rolls of each and froze them. Should last me until I retire.

There are lots of intros to developing. One I know of is:

Beginner's Guide to B&W Processing - APUG

You might find some of the APUG site interesting also.

Jeff
WJW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 03:18 PM   #9
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 673
You can have my B&W chemicals too LOL

and it's best to do your own B&W especially the film processing.
__________________
Make a little one happy this Christmas
Clicker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 03:25 PM   #10
Pentaxian
 
Gooshin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toronto, the one in Canada.
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 2,584
Originally Posted by Clicker View Post
You can have my B&W chemicals too LOL

and it's best to do your own B&W especially the film processing.
why do you think its best (other than cost)


i mean, if i have it down to a science maybe, but for a beginner?
__________________
„¸¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨ „ø¤º°¨
¨°º¤ø„ OBAMA „ø¤º°¨
¸„ø¤º°¨2008 ``°º¤ø„¸
ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¨°º¤ø
Gooshin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 03:30 PM   #11
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 673
Originally Posted by Gooshin View Post
why do you think its best (other than cost)


i mean, if i have it down to a science maybe, but for a beginner?
You can process the film the way you like; normal, pushed, pulled to achieve the final print that you hope to get. It's especially useful if you have graded paper vs a multigrade to get that final look you are aiming for.
__________________
Make a little one happy this Christmas
Clicker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 03:45 PM   #12
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Gallery Photos: 9
Posts: 102
Developing your own B&W is cheap and easy. You need a dev canister, get a double 35mm, so you can do 2 35mm rolls or 1 120 roll, and reels. You can find these cheep used. Find a closet to load the film, and the rest is done in the light. Unless you plan to do a few roll a week, I wouldn't recommend buying chemicals in bulk, they go bad too fast. With 500ml bottles It's about a buck to develop a canister, ie. two 35mm or one 120. It's better to do youself for the cost, and also because you can control the contrast of the negs. Adjusting the exposure in the camera effects the shadows more, while dev time changes the highlights more. Pretty soon you'll have a dedicared room and an enlarger.
Good luck, Ryan
__________________
K10d, ZX-5n, ME super, MX, Spotmatic II
ryno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 10:53 PM   #13
Loyal Member
 
ryan s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Madison
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 592
Check out the Massive Dev Chart to match film to developers with regard to time and temp
__________________
K10D | D-BG2 | Vivitar 28/2.5 | Tamron SP Macro 90/2.5 + SP 2x Tele | Zenitar 16/2.8 | FA 80-320/slow | A 24-50/4 | Sears 55/1.4
Proud MF'er Manual Focus Forum
Join us to fight "LBA" and post some pix. Together, let's get creative with what we've got.
ryan s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2008, 02:24 AM   #14
Loyal Member
 
KungPOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Gallery Photos: 50
Posts: 395
I just started to develope my own film.

It was easier to do then I expected. I like that I don't need to make the trip to the lab. I like that it is a process I am learning to fine tune.

The tank and chemicals cost me less then $100.00. At the lab I used, each frame cost about $0.50 to develope and scan (roll of 24 cost about 12 bucks). So, it will take 9 rolls of 24 to cover my initial costs. If I want to cover the cost of my scanner, I need to go through another 15 roles or so. I expect I will have covered my costs in the next three months.
KungPOW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2008, 07:40 AM   #15
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 673
Originally Posted by KungPOW View Post
I just started to develope my own film.

It was easier to do then I expected. I like that I don't need to make the trip to the lab. I like that it is a process I am learning to fine tune.

The tank and chemicals cost me less then $100.00. At the lab I used, each frame cost about $0.50 to develope and scan (roll of 24 cost about 12 bucks). So, it will take 9 rolls of 24 to cover my initial costs. If I want to cover the cost of my scanner, I need to go through another 15 roles or so. I expect I will have covered my costs in the next three months.
Look around for an enlarger, trays and you're all setup to do your own B&&W prints and some filters if they're not built in.
__________________
Make a little one happy this Christmas
Clicker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:35 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.