PentaxForums.com

Go Back PentaxForums.com > Photography > Pentax News and Rumors > Pentax News...Something Interesting..Really!

Pentax News and Rumors Discuss rumored Pentax news (that 'upcoming' Pentax full-frame) in this forum; there is also a section for official news.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
01-01-2009, 08:16 PM   #661
Pentaxian
 
Location: Philippines
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,378
Originally Posted by dopeytree View Post
I've put the best videos made with the canon 5d mark II on myblog M.é.m.o.i.r.e.s

I hope pentax can do something like this with their cameras as it's the depth of field and low light performance you dont get on ordinary hd camcorders unless you start shooting with red but thats cinema quality!
And a high price tag, to boot (referring to your red statement).

In any case, I do appreciate what the 5D Mk II and D90 bring to the table, quirks and all. Anyway, it's first generation technology and it could only improve and give other manufacturers (including Pentax) something to work on, as well, as long as it doesn't compromise the still photo side of things and it won't cost extra, for the most part.
vinzer is offline  
01-02-2009, 01:52 AM   #662
Senior Member
 
Location: Nanaimo, BC
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 229
It's always an uphill battle, progress. On one side, you have the physical and developmental limitations of getting video into SLRs, and then you have those who decry this as difiling the tool of the modern photographer.

I can't say I'd take tha approach to the video debate, but I will say this: every "convergeance" device I've ever purchased, sold, borrowed, or used had compromises, one way or the other. Video on a DSLR is convenient if it's the only camera you have with you when you want to take video, but otherwise, I agree with others saying this is just a parlour trick. Every few years it's something else that has nothing to do with actually taking a picture, but is a "must have" for every DSLR owner. It won't replace dedicated devices for recording video in the same way that Apple still sells millions of iPods every year to people who own cellphones instead of selling them iPhones.
drewdlephone is offline  
01-05-2009, 12:13 PM   #663
Site Supporter
 
Location: Paris, France
Gallery Photos: 171
Posts: 3,400
Originally Posted by Kunzite View Post
GaryM, well said.
But now we found out it's not really outperforming the K20D/31mm Limited, except for AF when the G1 gladly used it's AF-assist lamp And as a small, quiet camera.
So, can we let this rest?

News? I have news for you! In 2009 we'll see from Pentax something interesting. Really!
I am pretty sure we will as well!

Ben
benjikan is online now  
01-05-2009, 12:48 PM   #664
Pentaxian
 
Location: Street, Somerset, UK
Gallery Photos: 2
Posts: 563
Originally Posted by benjikan View Post
I am pretty sure we will as well!

Ben
Ben what do you think about video on dslrs? Having seen these short films: A New Era
dopeytree is offline  
01-05-2009, 01:49 PM   #665
Site Supporter
 
Location: Paris, France
Gallery Photos: 171
Posts: 3,400
Originally Posted by dopeytree View Post
Ben what do you think about video on dslrs? Having seen these short films: A New Era
I feel it is the way of the future. I would love to be able to have SMPT on a camera so I could synch sound to the imagery. I love the rendition of video on the Canon 5D Mkll.

Ben
benjikan is online now  
01-05-2009, 02:04 PM   #666
Site Supporter
 
Location: socal
Gallery Photos: 2
Posts: 1,566
Originally Posted by benjikan View Post
I feel it is the way of the future. I would love to be able to have SMPT on a camera so I could synch sound to the imagery. I love the rendition of video on the Canon 5D Mkll.

Ben
This is what currently makes it a parlor trick (or at least very narrow focus) imho - sound issues. While you can certainly bring a field sound setup, if the camera doesn't spit out timecode you're stuck with manual sync...which isn't pretty. That's why we're seeing music videos at this point.

I have no doubt that they'll either add smpte or someone will come up with a creative way around it. But that does then beg the question about the market for such a product, and if they are going to cannibalize higher-end videocam sales. For instance when I need video I have a Canon XH-A1 that I use, along with a cheap Canon HD videocam for b-roll. While the XH-A1 doesn't have interchangeable lenses or a big sensor like the 5D, it has real provisions for sound as well as timecode. Plus it is in a form factor that works pretty well for handheld or shooting on sticks.

The next few years will be interesting in this area.
nostatic is offline  
01-21-2009, 04:44 PM   #667
Site Supporter
 
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 2,219
Here's my crappy review of the G1 as promised, btw:

Panasonic Lumix G1 Micro Four Thirds Camera Review - Unbiased digital camera reviews, prices, and advice

deadwolfbones is offline  
01-21-2009, 05:31 PM   #668
Site Supporter
 
Location: Fredonia, NY
Gallery Photos: 6
Posts: 761
In the "Image Quality" section: "I found these traits in the Olympus E-520 (Olympus Evolt E-520 Digital SLR Review - Unbiased digital camera reviews, prices, and advice) (a camera that shares the same sensor as the G1) as well."

? The Olympus E-520 uses an older 10mp Panasonic sensor, not the same as the 12mp sensor in the G1. The G1 sensor may also be the sensor used in the upcoming 12mp E-30, but this has yet to be confirmed.
er1kksen is offline  
01-21-2009, 06:40 PM   #669
Site Supporter
 
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 2,219
Originally Posted by er1kksen View Post
In the "Image Quality" section: "I found these traits in the Olympus E-520 (Olympus Evolt E-520 Digital SLR Review - Unbiased digital camera reviews, prices, and advice) (a camera that shares the same sensor as the G1) as well."

? The Olympus E-520 uses an older 10mp Panasonic sensor, not the same as the 12mp sensor in the G1. The G1 sensor may also be the sensor used in the upcoming 12mp E-30, but this has yet to be confirmed.
Thanks for that correction. Not sure where I got it from.

I also made a few other typos ("G2" in the last line, for instance). Should be edited shortly.
deadwolfbones is offline  
01-21-2009, 06:49 PM   #670
Pentaxian
 
Location: London, England
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,088
Originally Posted by drewdlephone View Post
It's always an uphill battle, progress. On one side, you have the physical and developmental limitations of getting video into SLRs, and then you have those who decry this as difiling the tool of the modern photographer.

I can't say I'd take tha approach to the video debate, but I will say this: every "convergeance" device I've ever purchased, sold, borrowed, or used had compromises, one way or the other. Video on a DSLR is convenient if it's the only camera you have with you when you want to take video, but otherwise, I agree with others saying this is just a parlour trick. Every few years it's something else that has nothing to do with actually taking a picture, but is a "must have" for every DSLR owner. It won't replace dedicated devices for recording video in the same way that Apple still sells millions of iPods every year to people who own cellphones instead of selling them iPhones.
There is a reason why video cameras are the shape and form factor they are. If you want to focus and zoom during capture, and record quality sound, then the stills camera form factor is useless, just as the video camera format is not ideal for achieving a steady single shutter press.

I know Magnum wanted their news photographers to be able to capture video, but I would still prefer a dedicated stills camera.

I think the micro4/3 type camera would be a much better bet because it already has permanent live view and an "always open" shutter. Plus I can use the viewfinder for video recording in sunlight. Also, without a mirror box and with a small sensor, the form factor could be changed to make a much more successful hybrid camera.
*isteve is offline  
03-01-2009, 02:14 PM   #671
Senior Member
 
Location: U.S. /Miami - Florida.
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 204
nt

vitalsax is offline  
04-02-2009, 12:02 AM   #672
Administrator
Site Webmaster
 
Location: New York
Gallery Photos: 55
Posts: 4,804
I'd hate to see our most-viewed thread ever die away! So when's the K30D coming???
Adam is online now  
04-02-2009, 12:18 AM   #673
Pentaxian
 
Location: Tulsa, OK
Gallery Photos: 4
Posts: 2,092
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
I'd hate to see our most-viewed thread ever die away! So when's the K30D coming???
The second Tuesday of next week, last I heard.
Venturi is offline  
04-02-2009, 06:36 AM   #674
Site Supporter
 
Location: Paris, France
Gallery Photos: 171
Posts: 3,400
Originally Posted by Venturi View Post
The second Tuesday of next week, last I heard.
I thought it was the third Monday...
benjikan is online now  
04-02-2009, 09:16 AM   #675
Senior Member
 
Location: Vancouver, BC
Gallery Photos: 32
Posts: 277
But only...

Originally Posted by benjikan View Post
I thought it was the third Monday...
in weeks with an 'Arrr' in it.

It's been delayed because they can't decide on whether the pro camera should be fuscha or sea foam, with a matching Burberry battery pack and flash, and they can't seem to get the lenses to not-match properly.

Cheers,
Cameron
Cambo is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:21 PM.