Thanks for the link! I don't know how they use to measure the noise levels. But, if you take their K10D test as a comparism (link), they say K20D's ISO 400 is worse than K10D's ISO 800. Having seen several K20D samples and knowing how high ISO looks on K10D this is a somewhat surprising find.
Concering their AF speed test I think it's another surprise that the focusing speed of the K20D is exactly the same as the K10D's. On every light level, down to the second decimal place! I wonder if they really tested this or just said: "well, it's the same AF system, so let's copypaste the old results."
Someone mentioned that the K20d has high ISO noise reduction turned off by default. So, popphoto didn't bother to test it with anything but the default noise reduction mode.
0.5 stops better shake reduction is nice.
Better battery life is also good.
Lots of detail (and they probably only used the kit lens).
Interestingly, they don't seem to concerned about the relatively slow fps.
1) 5% Spot metering? Isn't that nearly double the K10D? And I thought Canon was bad.
2) The D3 was also reviewed in this issue. From ISO 100-1600, the K20D edges it out in IQ, and is only a hair under at ISO 3200. Resolution and Color Accuracy was also better on the K20D.
3) With regards to noise, I found it funny that on the D3 test they jacked the NR as high as it could go (and got some pretty impressive results), yet nothing is mentioned about NR on the Pentax.
By the way, if this is your thing, read it while it's hot and save the images...I'm sure DPR will take down this copyright infringing post relatively quickly.
If I read this review correctly, and compare it to D300, 40D or A700 from the same site, the K20D has considerably more noise at all ISO (heck, it has even more noise than K10...), slower AF, less color accuracy and jpeg quality at all ISO, a less efficient SR than the other stabilized body, a less interesting LV than the other cameras offering LV, a smaller screen, and it goes on...
The only thing they give it is a small advantage in resolution...
That's not a cold shower, it's a debacle... or a murder attempt...
Oh well... Pop Photo won't help sell K20D... next in line!
If I read this review correctly, and compare it to D300, 40D or A700 from the same site, the K20D has considerably more noise at all ISO (heck, it has even more noise than K10...), slower AF, less color accuracy and jpeg quality at all ISO, a less efficient SR than the other stabilized body, a less interesting LV than the other cameras offering LV, a smaller screen, and it goes on...
The only thing they give it is a small advantage in resolution...
That's not a cold shower, it's a debacle... or a murder attempt...
Oh well... Pop Photo won't help sell K20D... next in line!
I wonder what firmware version the camera PopPhoto tested has? Is it the final production version? I doubt it. I imagine the results would be somewhat better with the best possible firmware.
I wonder what firmware version the camera PopPhoto tested is? Is it the production version? I doubt it. I imagine the results would be somewhat better with the best possible firmware.
They indicate it's one of the first "production camera" so I imagine it's firmware 1.00.
I think that the default combination 'bright mode" (==>colors off) + NR off (==> high noise) goes along way into explaining the rather poor notations...
These are just settings of course, real potential won't appear in any review, I'll wait for experienced photographers getting there hands on a production K20 to see how this baby sings (and make a purchase decision eventually).
But I am afraid that tests and charts won't show it's true potential (if any).
Hrrmph...something strange must've happened in Dubai to these journo's they flew over. Im guessing they were informed after the fact that what they speculated to be roast potatoes over dinner at the plush hotel was in fact roasted camel nuts...that could definetly leave a bad taste in the mouth.
We've all been privy to reviewers skills before...this could be another case of Pentax choosing silly default settings again. You'd think they'd learn after Phils notorious review of "soft" jpegs.....time to incorporate a "Silly" mode especially for reviewers with a little retarded icon on the dial.
