Originally Posted by Vil
From my experience, Ned's statement rings true. I know a few former K1000 users who, when it was time to move to DLSRs, didn't give Pentax a second thought. Because of Pentax's slow transition to digital and lack of advertising they moved on to other brands.
I was one of those K1000 users in college from 97-98 or so. I kept it and bought a Canon Digital G2 after college (DSLRs weren't up to snuff at the time). Then when it finally came time to but a DSLR it was just a fluke that I found the K100D/K10D. I had no idea Pentax was still making SLR's. I just happened to see one in a small camera shop and asked to see it. Then I went online and read all about them and decided to go with Pentax. Lets just say Pentax's visibility could be a touch better.
Even now I have to call all the local camera shops to confirm they have Pentax gear before hand so I don't waste a trip. I know they say they can't meet demand, want to be a niche player, etc...but they simply have to get the K200D into a big box store. IMO the K200D is no more "niche" then the Rebel XSi is "niche". They are both really, really good SLR's for either first time buyers or for people that prefer smaller cameras. There's nothing niche about it. What exactly is the point of making such a camera if first time SLR buyers can't even find it on a shelf? Especially when they can easily test out the Sony A200/D60/XSi at any Best Buy they go to? Why would someone go out of their way for a camera a lot of reviewers say is inferior to the XSi?
Now if they made a range finder, or APS-C pocket cam then they would have a niche product.