D-FA 50mm f/1.0 SDM

jaad75 · 05-24-2009, 09:03 AM

Do you see what I see?

Can anybody confirm that?

pasipasi · 05-24-2009, 09:04 AM

Certainly interesting

konraDarnok · 05-24-2009, 09:15 AM

curses! Too long. And why? This mythological lens needs to be 30mm to make me save my pennies.

ogl · 05-24-2009, 09:15 AM

Where did you gеt it?

Philippos · 05-24-2009, 09:17 AM

I hope it's true. A prime prime.

ogl · 05-24-2009, 09:20 AM

It's not MF lens. Too fast for MF.

Tana · 05-24-2009, 09:20 AM

Is that what we saw on K7 in few weeks ago? it has a clue.

ogl · 05-24-2009, 09:22 AM

yes. at K-7 of Maxim Chicherin.
http://www.chicherin.com/

jaad75 · 05-24-2009, 09:23 AM

The clue is D-FA and SDM... Do you know any camera that needs D-FA and SDM?...

Ratmagiclady · 05-24-2009, 09:25 AM

Originally posted by konraDarnok

curses! Too long. And why? This mythological lens needs to be 30mm to make me save my pennies.

I think it's going to take more than pennies.

If you want a 1.0, getting it down to 30mm would at least require hugeness, there's laws of physics involved. Doesn't D-FA mean it'd cover full-frame, though, if it's a normal you want?

I'm kind of suspecting hoax, though.

ogl · 05-24-2009, 09:28 AM

Originally posted by jaad75

the clue is d-fa and sdm... Do you know any camera that needs d-fa and sdm?...

k-3 24 mp ff

give us the source.

inferno10 · 05-24-2009, 09:41 AM

Glad I didn't buy the DA* 55mm f/1.4 yet. I'm gonna need all the pennies I can save for that lens if the picture is true.

- Jason

RawheaD · 05-24-2009, 09:42 AM

Yeah, I can confirm that.

That it's a fake :-D For obvious reasons; (a) as I've said elsewhere, I'm 99.9% positive that it is physically impossible to make an f1.0 lens for PK mount; (b) like jaad75 says; D-"FA" + SDM, :lolz: ; (c) if the product is so far along it's development line that there would already be a user manual for it (as the picture implies), there's no way we don't know about it already *and*, even if this was some secret product intended for a surprise announcement, there's no reason it wasn't announced along with the K-7.

jaad75 · 05-24-2009, 09:43 AM

Originally posted by ogl

k-3 24 mp ff

give us the source.

It was posted by unknown user on Polish forum. He wrote only 2 posts so far - the first one was a sample picture form K-7 before the official premiere and a second one is that picture...

asdf · 05-24-2009, 09:43 AM

Originally posted by jaad75

Do you see what I see?

Can anybody confirm that?

The label should read "D FA 645 55 F2.8."

http://www.pentax.jp/english/imaging...ns/roadmap.pdf

05-24-2009, 09:03 AM	#1
jaad75 Forum Member	D-FA 50mm f/1.0 SDM Do you see what I see? Can anybody confirm that?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version E-mail to a Friend	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Another SDM Failure - 16-50mm f/2.8	Donkeypunch	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	40	12-05-2011 04:09 PM
Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC with OS (~SDM)	bc_the_path	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	2	10-12-2010 01:40 AM
For Sale - Expired: Da* 16-50mm f2.8 SDM (Worldwide)	roentarre	Expired Listings	44	10-06-2010 08:14 AM
DA 17-70mm SDM vs DA* 16-50mm SDM?	shang	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	4	07-02-2010 06:09 AM
DA*16-50mm F2.8ED Al SDM	john mood	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	2	12-17-2009 06:30 AM

05-24-2009, 09:04 AM	#2
pasipasi Veteran Member	Certainly interesting

05-24-2009, 09:15 AM	#3
konraDarnok Veteran Member	curses! Too long. And why? This mythological lens needs to be 30mm to make me save my pennies.

05-24-2009, 09:17 AM	#5
Philippos Senior Member	I hope it's true. A prime prime.

05-24-2009, 09:20 AM	#6
ogl Pentaxian	It's not MF lens. Too fast for MF.

05-24-2009, 09:20 AM	#7
Tana New Member	Is that what we saw on K7 in few weeks ago? it has a clue.

05-24-2009, 09:22 AM	#8
ogl Pentaxian	yes. at K-7 of Maxim Chicherin. http://www.chicherin.com/

05-24-2009, 09:23 AM	#9
jaad75 Forum Member	The clue is D-FA and SDM... Do you know any camera that needs D-FA and SDM?...

05-24-2009, 09:25 AM	#10
Ratmagiclady Pentaxian	Originally posted by konraDarnok curses! Too long. And why? This mythological lens needs to be 30mm to make me save my pennies. I think it's going to take more than pennies. If you want a 1.0, getting it down to 30mm would at least require hugeness, there's laws of physics involved. Doesn't D-FA mean it'd cover full-frame, though, if it's a normal you want? I'm kind of suspecting hoax, though.

05-24-2009, 09:28 AM	#11
ogl Pentaxian	Originally posted by jaad75 the clue is d-fa and sdm... Do you know any camera that needs d-fa and sdm?... k-3 24 mp ff give us the source.

05-24-2009, 09:41 AM	#12
inferno10 Veteran Member	Glad I didn't buy the DA* 55mm f/1.4 yet. I'm gonna need all the pennies I can save for that lens if the picture is true. - Jason

05-24-2009, 09:42 AM	#13
RawheaD Veteran Member	Yeah, I can confirm that. That it's a fake :-D For obvious reasons; (a) as I've said elsewhere, I'm 99.9% positive that it is physically impossible to make an f1.0 lens for PK mount; (b) like jaad75 says; D-"FA" + SDM, :lolz: ; (c) if the product is so far along it's development line that there would already be a user manual for it (as the picture implies), there's no way we don't know about it already and, even if this was some secret product intended for a surprise announcement, there's no reason it wasn't announced along with the K-7.

05-24-2009, 09:43 AM	#14
jaad75 Forum Member	Originally posted by ogl k-3 24 mp ff give us the source. It was posted by unknown user on Polish forum. He wrote only 2 posts so far - the first one was a sample picture form K-7 before the official premiere and a second one is that picture...

05-24-2009, 09:43 AM	#15
asdf Veteran Member	Originally posted by jaad75 Do you see what I see? Can anybody confirm that? The label should read "D FA 645 55 F2.8." http://www.pentax.jp/english/imaging...ns/roadmap.pdf