PentaxForums.com  

Go Back   PentaxForums.com > Pentax Photography > Pentax SLR Lens Discussion

Pentax SLR Lens Discussion Comment on or exchange opinions about any Pentax SLR lenses in this section!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-19-2008, 07:02 PM   #31
Site Supporter
 
jsherman999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,812
.


It's worth it, people!!

Some test shots taken the last couple days from a good copy:

Picasa Web Albums - Jay - DA_16_50



.
__________________
K20D + K100D Super
DA* 50-135 f2.8 | DA 12-24 f4, 35ltd f2.8 Macro | FA 77ltd 1.8, 43 ltd 1.9 | F 50 1.7 | K 55 1.8, 35 3.5 | M 200 4, 135 3.5, 100 2.8, 85 2, 50 1.4, 28 2.8, 20 4 | Super Takumar 200 f4, 135 f3.5, 55 1.8, 50 1.4, 35 3.5 | Vivitar 28 2.8 Close Focus ("K2") | Tamron 28-75 2.8 XR LD Di , 70-200 2.8 LD Di Macro | Sigma 70 f/2.8 EX DG Macro

Last edited by jsherman999; 03-19-2008 at 07:36 PM..
jsherman999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 02:18 AM   #32
Site Supporter
 
wtlwdwgn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Billings, MT
Gallery Photos: 18
Posts: 175
I have SN 9015311. Although it was back focusing a little, between 10 and 40mm, I was getting really great images with it. I did send it , the 50-135, and the K10D to Pentax USA for service and adjustment. I got it all back within two weeks all nice and shiny and clean. It no longer back focuses and the images are just as good as before.
__________________
Steve
K10D, K20D, some old and new stuff.
wtlwdwgn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 08:40 AM   #33
dbh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edmonton
Gallery Photos: 26
Posts: 248
9012359, good, bought locally

To the OP do you have a summary table of your data so far?
--
dbh
dbh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 11:25 AM   #34
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 18
So, while there's not nearly enough data to be statically significant as was already mentioned, there exists the possiblity for a couple of trends developing.

The four earliest recorded serial numbers to this point are "good". This is the only time in our limited sample that we have a trend of four "good" numbers in a row.

While there is no direct correlation between serial numbers and dates purchased, if we assume that observation #1 is true, then the "bad" numbers start around the turn of the year.

The last two entries, the two highest serial numbers, are listed as "good". While this isn't nearly enough to draw any conclusions, we may have a starting line for "good" lenses.

A "bad" copy with a lower serial number than those mentioned in #4 was received on March 17th. Regardless of assumptions on #3, inventory has not turned over with shipments of "good" lenses as of this date.

Serial Status Place and Date
9011133 good used from a forum member
9012269 good Pentax retailer in Helsinkiin October
9012359 good bought locally
9012509 good
9012541 bad Amazon, beginning of January
9013067 good
9013251 good
9013254 bad
9014888 good
9015311 bad
9015921 bad hometown store
9016333 bad
9017115 good
9017292 bad B&H
9017525 bad So it's a bad copy on K10D, but a good one on K20D
9017549 good Digit-Photo in December
9018018 bad Amazon
9018137 bad Amazon03-17-2008
9018380 bad B&H
9019612 good
9021117 good
applejax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 11:38 AM   #35
dbh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edmonton
Gallery Photos: 26
Posts: 248
Too bad we so far cannot decode from the S/N such things as a change in factory, which batch of glass was used, day of the week, or disgruntled QC inspector etc.
But presumably Pentax has all of that info and more and, unless they don't care, at some point the bad ones should disappear completely.
In other words from about 9020000 on should be dud-free.
--
dbh - the optimist thinks thinks things have never been better. the pessimist fears the optimist is correct.
dbh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2008, 10:52 AM   #36
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 7
9017856 decent

Focusing seems about right, only complaints is some CA and the SDM focusing tends to chirp as it moves in and out of focus. Anyone care to comment on what their SDM motor sounds like?
dietcokefiend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2008, 11:17 AM   #37
Loyal Member
 
bymy141's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holland
Gallery Photos: 28
Posts: 472
Originally Posted by dietcokefiend View Post
9017856 decent

Focusing seems about right, only complaints is some CA and the SDM focusing tends to chirp as it moves in and out of focus. Anyone care to comment on what their SDM motor sounds like?
Mine is completely silent.

- Bert
__________________
Pentax: K10D, DA 18-55mm, DA* 16-50mm, FA 50mm/f1.4, Tamron: 18-250mm, Kenko 1.5x TC, and loads of old stuff
bymy141 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2008, 11:56 AM   #38
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 7
Yea mine was too, and still is for the first one or 2 focuses after letting it sit. If you start focusing on multiple points close or far away, the thing has a bit of a faint chirp when it reaches the target, then a bit of a small click as it releases the clutch mechanism. Moving back and forth it just has a mild whirr sound to it, just like my DA* 200mm.

The 200 also has the click as the clutches engage/disengage, but not of the chirp. We did have another older DA* model in the office that had a faint chipmonk sound, but it was much much older. Perhaps it is just something that shows up as it breaks in and loosens up?

Focusing otherwise is spot on at both 16 and 50mm.
dietcokefiend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 10:24 PM   #39
Loyal Member
 
rvannatta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Apiary, Oregon
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 302
9012114 here.--- Although I have mumbled about it, I cannot demonstrate obvious bad behavior. I'm inclined to rate it asa good as there is no obvious front or back focus. What I see particularly with my early one added to the list is thte the early numbers seem to be pretty good---or else all the bad ones have been long ago returned and the Serial # forgotten.
__________________
Pentax Super Program, zx-5n, istD, K10d
SMCA 15mm, 24-50, 35-70,50, 100macro, 135, 200
SMCA* 300 F/2.8, 600 F/5.6, F 50mm macro, F 35-135
FA 17-28, 24 f/2, 24-90, 28, 50 f/1.4, 80-320 DA* 16-50,
website at www.vannattabros.com/pictures.html

Last edited by rvannatta; 03-23-2008 at 10:48 PM..
rvannatta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 05:07 AM   #40
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 4
I just bought one of these. It works. I have no interest in the serial number. Come on, fellas, get on with it.
Polaski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 03:45 PM   #41
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 257
Bad: 9016761, 9013124

Good: 9011024
Tbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 01:44 AM   #42
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Gallery Photos: 5
Posts: 747
This one's on my LBA list, so I'm interested in the resolution of the problems reported by some Forum members. Please, to make this thread useful, can you post where you purchased the lens along with its S/N? When this reporting is hit or miss, we can't resolve the allegation that some vendors are reselling returned duds. Thanks, everyone!
__________________

All my relations, Christine
Cameras: K10D w/D-BG2; Asahi Spotmatic
Lenses: DA 18-55mm, DA* 50-135mm; 28, 35, and 50mm SMC Takumars, 80-200mm Tokina
christinelandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 03:12 PM   #43
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 83
9019346 from Willoughby's appears to be good. I tested the lens with the focus test chart, newspaper, and flowers.
__________________

Last edited by thear; 03-28-2008 at 12:13 PM..
thear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008, 03:42 PM   #44
Loyal Member
 
aegisphan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tustin, California
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 673
9018546 from Amazon is an excellent copy. I bought it on Wednesday, March 26th. And this is my first try too . By the way, I use it on my K20D so I don't know about its performance on the K10D yet.
__________________
I'm cured .
aegisphan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 10:44 PM   #45
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 34
I bought mine from Willoughby's Camera within the last month. The serial number is 9021232 and the edges are super sharp wide open at 16mm. Given the history with this lens, I've been looking for trouble with mine, but I haven't found anything yet.
frostugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:36 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.