Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
05-08-2008, 11:04 AM   #1
Veteran Member
Fl_Gulfer's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida Gulfer
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,054
Close-Up lens filters

Staff note: This post may contain affiliate links, which means Pentax Forums may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. If you would like to support the forum directly, you may also make a donation here.


Has anyone had any experience with these Close-Up lens filters? I ordered a set last weekend and they sent 82mm instead of the 62mm I ordered. So I had to send them back today and wait a week for the correct ones, I'm going to try them on my Tamron 18-250mm Ld Di II 1:3.5-6.3 (iF) Macro.... I also have a UV filter on my lens,, do I remove it first? Is there any special setting I should use for the Macro shots? I notice if I get too close to a object the camera won't take a picture, is that normal for a camera with any lens?
As you can see I still have no clue what I'm doing after a year yet.

05-08-2008, 12:38 PM   #2
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
pentagor's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia
Posts: 495
Close up lenses or diopters are inexpensive macro tools. I got myself one set (52mm), but then I upgraded to Raynox DRC-250.
First of all, you have to put the camera in MF to shoot. Auto focus does not work with diopters.
Note that the images will be rubbish at the edges, only sharp in the center. Also depends on a quality of diopters you purchased of course.
Some examples with mine:







Good luck!
05-08-2008, 09:59 PM   #3
q10
Junior Member




Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 32
QuoteOriginally posted by pentagor Quote
First of all, you have to put the camera in MF to shoot. Auto focus does not work with diopters.
i just got out my *ist DS, put switched it into autofocus, affixed a cheap old +4 diopter, and took a couple of shots of my keyboard without touching the focus ring ...

... and it sure seemed to be autofocusing, and the pictures sure look like the thing at the focus point i selected was in focus. it looks like i might have some very marginal front focus, but if it does it's pretty close to negligible, and may just be a sign of a general flaw with my camera or my lens.

could you explain what you mean about autofocus not working?
05-09-2008, 01:15 AM   #4
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
pentagor's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia
Posts: 495
My mistake in expression: AF will work, but I never shot macro with AF. And as you noticed, it could cause some FF/BF issues.

05-09-2008, 01:35 AM   #5
q10
Junior Member




Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 32
i suspect it mainly causes FF/BF to the extent that the narrow DoF associated with macro exagerrates minor flaws in the AF system. (i certainly feel more comfortable with MF macro most of the time, so i'm not trying to dispute your advice, i was just a little startled by your original wording.)
05-09-2008, 06:25 AM   #6
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 976
I have a set of Tiffen diopter lenses (52mm). Awful IQ.

I get MUCH better results from a Tamron 70-300 combined with a $15 eBay set of extension tubes. (Note: 100% manual in that config.)

Same tubes work great with an SMC-M 50.
05-09-2008, 06:57 AM   #7
Veteran Member
roentarre's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 11,783
Not a fan of close up filters. Extension tubes are better devices to be used.

05-09-2008, 07:45 AM   #8
Veteran Member
Buddha Jones's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,587
Granted that it is a lot of glass to shoot through, esp if you use the whole set like I did on my kit lens, but the results can be very, very pleasing.

Taken with the kit lens with the filters on.



Last edited by Buddha Jones; 05-09-2008 at 02:58 PM. Reason: type-o
05-09-2008, 09:19 AM   #9
Veteran Member
Fl_Gulfer's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida Gulfer
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,054
Original Poster
Is this what you are talking about?
Macro Extension Tube Set for Pentax K,PK mount camera - eBay (item 220232340929 end time May-13-08 12:22:23 PDT)
05-09-2008, 09:42 AM   #10
Banned




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Savannah, U.S./Baguio City, P.H.
Posts: 5,979
I own a set of pentax auto extension tubes as well as a set of Asahi pentax close-up filters and I much prefer the tubes. (bellows are the ultimate way to go if the hassle is worth it to you.) compensating for a slight loss of light is much better and yields much better results than diopters, besides with diopters the DOF becomes so narrow that even with MF the slightest movement can cause bad focus. but can result in some interesting photos none the less.

smc-M 50mm 1:1.7 + Asahi Pentax close up lens No. 1

05-09-2008, 09:45 AM   #11
Veteran Member
bimjo's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pasco, WA
Posts: 967
The IQ you get with a diopter is directly related to the quality of the diopter used. This one seems pretty sharp edge-to-edge. Sigma 70-200+1.4 TC+Canon 500D (dual element diopter).

05-09-2008, 10:02 AM   #12
Veteran Member
Fritz's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tillamook, OR
Posts: 1,222
Before I got my Vivitar s1 105mm I used those exact set of tubes that you have linked to with my M 50mm f1.4. The tubes are a bit of a hassle when you are trying to figure out exactly the magnification that you want by adding and subtracting tubes. But once you figure that out they work very well, and I got some good results. I tried some diopters and didn't like the IQ that I got with them.
05-09-2008, 10:55 AM   #13
Veteran Member
Fl_Gulfer's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida Gulfer
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,054
Original Poster
Well I have the A 50mm f1.7 lens so they should work ok with them, Thanks guys for your help and great shots ...
I see some of those tubes cost over a 150.00 a set. why are they so much more? are they built for AF.?
05-09-2008, 11:10 AM   #14
Igilligan
Guest




I like these (img included)

I like these little lenses. I dont have the 1/2/3 style set like you ordered, but the raynox 250 or 150 clips on any lens with filter sizes from 52-67mm and I can even force it onto my 49mm ones in a pinch.

Here is a shot with the raynox clipped on the DA50-200
Attachment 11993

I look forward to your shots with your set when you get them...
05-10-2008, 04:44 PM   #15
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 976
Yes. Note: You MUST use a lens with an aperture ring with those tubes. Lenses with no aperture ring will stop down to minimum aperture on those tubes.

I hate the "crippled" KAF2 mount.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, close-up, close-up lens, filters, k-mount, lens, pentax lens, slr lens

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Close up Filters? Voodoo Daddy Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 25 05-12-2009 02:43 PM
For Sale - Sold: Huge Number of Filters. Polorizers, ND, UV, even an Achromatic Close-up! Most Youngster Sold Items 7 11-22-2008 09:11 PM
For Sale - Sold: FS: set of Tokina 55mm close-up filters heatherslightbox Sold Items 2 01-20-2008 01:18 PM
For Sale - Sold: Close-up Lens and Assorted Filters for 49mm Threads - Dirt Cheap! GaryML Sold Items 1 04-21-2007 01:19 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:22 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top