PentaxForums.com  

Go Back   PentaxForums.com > Pentax Photography > Pentax SLR Lens Discussion

Pentax SLR Lens Discussion Comment on or exchange opinions about any Pentax SLR lenses in this section!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-31-2008, 06:42 AM   #196
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Norway
Gallery Photos: 2
Posts: 104
Shot with the M50 f/2 in my yard.










KjetilH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 06:51 AM   #197
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Norway
Gallery Photos: 2
Posts: 104
And some photos from an event called "Sumprock" nearby. Also shot with the M50 f/2, most at ISO 1600, f/2.8-4 and 1/30-60 s:









The above picture reminds me of something when I look at the guitarist. Like another band photo or something.






It is not often I meet other people who has an equal interest in photography, but I ran into a guy with a 30D, and another with a D80, perfect setup for a little talk about equipment.


(And the pictures are generally not tack sharp because: a) The artists does move around, and 1/30s. is pretty much borderline for capturing their movements and b) I stood in the middle of the crowd, and lifted the camera above my head in order to avoid the heads in front of me. )
KjetilH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 07:24 AM   #198
AML
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 212
drerka, love your dogs shots.

Jay, your wonderful comments are doing my confidence the world of good. But, you have to stop posting such great shots with all these different M lenses, you are going to kill my already small budget.. LOL!! Seriously, loved all your dusk shots. You are so lucky to be up and about at that time, i'm not, so i always miss such photo ops.

KjetilH, such sharp detailed pics from your first post. You did exceptionally well for over the head shots at the concert.


Here's a couple more taken yesterday. These were shot wide open and at F2 at around 3pm.




The building on the left is a big block of apartments.










and this was taken on one of the first days of receiving the 1.7. It's #He looking for the misplaced shopping list.

__________________
Anne


Last edited by AML; 05-31-2008 at 06:43 PM.
AML is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 06:50 PM   #199
Site Supporter
 
jsherman999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,154
SMC M 50mm f/1.4

.


It hailed/rained here, had time to step out for some quick shots after in stopped.
Chose the M 50 1.4:












__________________
K20D + K100D Super
DA* 16-50 f2.8, 50-135 f2.8 | DA 12-24 f4, 35ltd f2.8 Macro | FA 77ltd 1.8, 50 1.4, 31ltd | K 55 1.8, 35 3.5 | M 200 4, 135 3.5, 100 2.8, 85 2, 50 1.4, 28 2.8 | S-M-C Takumar 200 f4, 150 f/4, 135 f3.5, 105 2.8, 55 1.8, 50 1.4, 35 3.5 | Vivitar 28 2.8 Close Focus ("K2") | C Zeiss Jena 50 f/2.8 | Jupiter-9 85 f2 | Helios 44M 50 f2 | Tamron 28-75 2.8 XR Di LD, 70-300 Di LD | Sigma 70 f/2.8 EX DG Macro
jsherman999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 07:09 PM   #200
AML
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 212
Jay, thanks for posting shots from the M 1.4. You did a great job capturing the water droplets.
Nice capture in #3 with the tiny bug. My favourite is the last shot with the bokeh. It has very nice detail and sharpness with the bud and the droplets of water underneath.
__________________
Anne

AML is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 07:11 PM   #201
Site Supporter
 
jsherman999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,154
K 35 f/3.5 vs M 50 f/1.4

.

Shot a couple with the K 35 f/3.5, then switched to the M 50 - interesting
comparison between these two shots, taken one after the other - The K 35's
color is a little 'warmer', perhaps. (No PP, and K shot is stopped down more)

K 35 f/3.5:



M 50 f/1.4:

__________________
K20D + K100D Super
DA* 16-50 f2.8, 50-135 f2.8 | DA 12-24 f4, 35ltd f2.8 Macro | FA 77ltd 1.8, 50 1.4, 31ltd | K 55 1.8, 35 3.5 | M 200 4, 135 3.5, 100 2.8, 85 2, 50 1.4, 28 2.8 | S-M-C Takumar 200 f4, 150 f/4, 135 f3.5, 105 2.8, 55 1.8, 50 1.4, 35 3.5 | Vivitar 28 2.8 Close Focus ("K2") | C Zeiss Jena 50 f/2.8 | Jupiter-9 85 f2 | Helios 44M 50 f2 | Tamron 28-75 2.8 XR Di LD, 70-300 Di LD | Sigma 70 f/2.8 EX DG Macro
jsherman999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 07:15 PM   #202
Site Supporter
 
jsherman999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,154
Thanks Ann! Unbelievable how sharp your 1.7 can be wide open and at f/2.
__________________
K20D + K100D Super
DA* 16-50 f2.8, 50-135 f2.8 | DA 12-24 f4, 35ltd f2.8 Macro | FA 77ltd 1.8, 50 1.4, 31ltd | K 55 1.8, 35 3.5 | M 200 4, 135 3.5, 100 2.8, 85 2, 50 1.4, 28 2.8 | S-M-C Takumar 200 f4, 150 f/4, 135 f3.5, 105 2.8, 55 1.8, 50 1.4, 35 3.5 | Vivitar 28 2.8 Close Focus ("K2") | C Zeiss Jena 50 f/2.8 | Jupiter-9 85 f2 | Helios 44M 50 f2 | Tamron 28-75 2.8 XR Di LD, 70-300 Di LD | Sigma 70 f/2.8 EX DG Macro
jsherman999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 07:33 PM   #203
AML
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 212
That's a very intersting comparison between the two lenses. I actually prefer the K 35 f/3.5 pic.
Too me, it has a greater/nicer depth of colour and the water droplets seem a tad sharper.

In pics #2, #3 and #4 i did sharpen them a little in Picasa.
From my testing so far, my 1.7 loves the 1.7 to 2.8 range. I can't wait to try some night shots with it. That's my next challenge
__________________
Anne

AML is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 09:37 PM   #204
Loyal Member
 
TourDeForce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Gallery Photos: 13
Posts: 335
Jay, I think the big difference may simply be the focal lengths. The 35mm is taking in more of the scene, so you're getting more lighting to average. A more even exposure simply because of the field of view.
__________________
Gentleman Jim at your service.
<a href=http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic4104_1.gif target=_blank>http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/s...gpic4104_1.gif</a>
TourDeForce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 09:57 PM   #205
Site Supporter
 
jsherman999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,154
Originally Posted by TourDeForce View Post
Jay, I think the big difference may simply be the focal lengths. The 35mm is taking in more of the scene, so you're getting more lighting to average. A more even exposure simply because of the field of view.
Jim, interesting idea, that could be it. But I have noticed that the K 35 is very, very good
with color, I just haven't been able to pinpoint anything specific due to lack of comparitive
shots... Now I'm going to have to try more 35/50 comparisons...
__________________
K20D + K100D Super
DA* 16-50 f2.8, 50-135 f2.8 | DA 12-24 f4, 35ltd f2.8 Macro | FA 77ltd 1.8, 50 1.4, 31ltd | K 55 1.8, 35 3.5 | M 200 4, 135 3.5, 100 2.8, 85 2, 50 1.4, 28 2.8 | S-M-C Takumar 200 f4, 150 f/4, 135 f3.5, 105 2.8, 55 1.8, 50 1.4, 35 3.5 | Vivitar 28 2.8 Close Focus ("K2") | C Zeiss Jena 50 f/2.8 | Jupiter-9 85 f2 | Helios 44M 50 f2 | Tamron 28-75 2.8 XR Di LD, 70-300 Di LD | Sigma 70 f/2.8 EX DG Macro

Last edited by jsherman999; 05-31-2008 at 10:03 PM.
jsherman999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 11:32 PM   #206
Senior Member
 
dosdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Gallery Photos: 4
Posts: 126
Brisbane City from Kangaroo Point Cliffs

Here's a shot from an M50/1.7 and a shot from a M28/2.8. Both ISO 200. K100D Super. Not sure of the aperture. That's something to consider for night-time shooting with an M lens: a small torch to confirm your aperture setting. Judging by the exposure times I suspect the M28 was stopped down more than the M50.

M28/2.8, 3secs





M50/1.7, 1/4sec

dosdan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2008, 01:50 AM   #207
Site Supporter
 
frank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Singapore
Gallery Photos: 1
Posts: 873
Just don't know what I'm doing, thought I was done w/ manual lenses, but still, got these gems very recently:



Bought them to use w/ the SuperPROGAM camera:







But I do think the silver FA43 matches the camera better:



Need to shoot some film when time comes.
__________________
Frank
frank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2008, 02:42 AM   #208
axl
Pentaxian
 
axl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London
Gallery Photos: 36
Posts: 1,087
I love the look of older Pentax film SLRs. Why don't they release one new digital one that wold look just like that! The 50th anniversary K10D came close, but never made it into production. Shame . So the last ones were *ist DL (maybe DL2) in the dual colour scheme. Shame then didn't carry that scheme over to K series.... Hopefully they will again....
__________________

-------------------------Peter--aka--Axl---------------------------
2 K100D bodies and assorted glass...
axl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2008, 04:53 AM   #209
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Norway
Gallery Photos: 2
Posts: 104
Thank you, and nice shots everyone.

axl: Oh, how I would love it. The old film SLRs really has a kind of magic in them.
KjetilH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2008, 04:39 PM   #210
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: JAKARTA
Gallery Photos: 3
Posts: 135
Hallo Jay :)


found around my house

shot with k10d + 50mm f/1.7 the only m i have at this moment
fearview is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:33 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.