I'm gaining a lot more respect for this little macro. I found it a bit limited on film but the "digital dividend" pumps it up to about 75mm which is a much more useful focal length for a macro. You won't find a sharper lens and it is so light-wieght you can carry it around all day.
I'm gaining a lot more respect for this little macro. I found it a bit limited on film but the "digital dividend" pumps it up to about 75mm which is a much more useful focal length for a macro. You won't find a sharper lens and it is so light-wieght you can carry it around all day.
Cheers,
Tom G
Thanks Tom,
I only bought it because it went for a silly price on Ebay and to be honest I used it once and put it away. Only got it out as I was going to put it on the forum marketplace but not so sure now.
Only thing is it over exposes horribly on the K10D.
__________________
**** Insert ego boosting camera equipment list here ****
***************** Pentax Gallery ******************
Over exposure. Hmmm. I hadn't noticed it on my K10. It probably happens with my M 50 macro as well. I just fiddle around with the aperture and shutter speed until I get something I like in the LCD panel. I then check the histogram for further confirmation. I use this procedure with all my manual focus lenses. I find I use my K and M series primes almost all the time and I don't even think about it any more. The results are usually worth the little bit of extra time and effort to my mind. I suppose one could adjust the exposure on the K10 to compensate if you were going to use the lens for an extended period of time.
Over exposure/under exposure whatever. I took the M 50mm macro out after reading Mike's post to see what I could find and have some fun. Nothing spectacular but here's what I got today:
On my monitor the FA 77 appears to be a bit sharper but the M 100 has the more pleasing skin tones. I agree with Bruce on this score. I always liked the M 100 2.8. Like a bloody fool I sold it ages ago.