Originally Posted by cooldude14es
Hi, very interesting review. I have a question for you: I own FA35 f2, do you think it is worthy to buy DA35?? I am happy with FA35 but I think maybe DA35 would fit best for digital cameras like my K10d. What do you think about it? Should I sell my FA35 and buy DA35 or just keep both or maybe I wont see much difference between them apart from the "macro"?
Thanks.
It really depends on you. There are a couple of things that make the DA35 attractive even if you have the FA35:
-- Quickshift manual focus
-- Better edge sharpness (even wide open)
-- Macro ability
There are also a couple of reasons to consider keeping the FA35:
-- Faster AF when "hunting" in low light (because the lens doesn't have to travel from 0.456 inches to infinity for focus)
-- Slighty faster aperture (f/2 vs f/2.8) for low light photography
In short, I think the DA35 is a good purchase if you find that you wish your FA35 could focus closer and/or if you often find yourself using manual focus.
I'm in something of a similar situation myself. I have the excellent DA40 Limited and I'm debating whether to purchase this DA35 Macro Limited. I have a longer dedicated macro lens and good closeup filters/lenses so I don't "need" the DA35 ... but I'm still very tempted to get it.
The DA35 is great because you can use it either as a general use "normal" lens or as an on-the-spot macro lens. However, because it's a dedicated macro lens sometimes it takes longer to focus than a lens like the FA35 or DA40 because the lens has to "rack the focus" over an extreme focus range.