The K 200/2.5 is amongst my all-time favourite lenses. I don’t have nearly as many lenses as you do but enough variety to make the choice interesting. For some reason I seem to prefer the telephotos – at least for the moment. I was quite impressed by the sharpness in the kyak image. The colours are quite vibrant as well vis-à-vis the flower. All things considered it’s a keeper. It is a heavy beast but the extra speed makes focusing easy. It’s nice to know images from this 30+ year-old glass, with a little time and effort, can still compare favourably with a modern Pentax 200mm offering. As for that SMC Tak 200, I’m sure in your hands the results would be even better.
Cheers,
Tom G
Last edited by 8540tomg; 07-21-2008 at 02:19 PM..
Reason: typo
That K 135 f 2.5 is a beauty. Sharpness and the added bonus wonderful colour rendering as well. Don't you love the fact that you get a digital dividend with this old glass? It takes an already sharp lens and then only uses only the optically best part in the center. How cool is that? I have the K 135 f 3.5 and I like it a lot but I'm starting to wish I had held out for the 2.5 version. There is just no substitute for speed.
Here are two... the landscape is an HDR done with the K28 f/3.5... the concert shot is from the K85 f/1.8.
Both are lenses that I don't use as often these days, being supplanted by the FA 31 and FA 77... but there was a time when I was armed only with an *ist DL, the 18-55mm, and a slew of K glass -- the above two, as well as the K35 f/2, K50 f/1.4, K85 Soft f/2.2, K100 Macro f/4, K200 f/4, and K300 f/4.
I only have the one K lens (though I'm very tempted by the K55 1.8 too).
K 28mm f3.5
I don't use this lens nearly enough.
Click on the image to view it in a larger size
That is one of the most interesting images I have seen in a while. Was this captured on film or digital? The FOV almost seems too expansive to be a 28mm on APS-C.
Thanks - it was digital K100D with the K28 f3.5 - this is the whole frame, (I just went and checked the raw file). The only lens I have wider than this 28mm is the kit lens, which would have given me aperture, focal length data in the exif. I reckon the 28 was the only lens I took with me that day.
Some more from the k28/3.5 which followed me to Toronto last week end:
This is around f8.
This lens keeps on surprising me...
What type of flute do you play that lenses are following you about, especially from Montreal to Toronto??..
BTW, I really enjoy all of the (Fill-in-the-Designation)-Club lens threads..Thanks to all those members who started them..Lotta, lotta, lotta truly useful information on these threads..
What type of flute do you play that lenses are following you about, especially from Montreal to Toronto??..
Bruce
Flute is composed of GX-10 and a few Lowepro lens pouches. So far it works well, the lenses are following me EVERYWHERE (but the kit lens, it's mad because I don't use it anymore...)
__________________
From Pentax: M 50/1.7; K 28/3.5
From Samsung: GX-10; D-Xenon 18-55 (for sale)
From Sigma: 15mm FishEye; 12-24 EX